2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfa.2010.12.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extrapolation of weights revisited: New proofs and sharp bounds

Abstract: We use an appropriate factorization of the A p weights to give another proof of the extrapolation theorem of Rubio de Francia. It provides sharp bounds in terms of the A p -constant of the weights. Then we extend the result to more general settings including off-diagonal and partial range extrapolation. Among the applications, we prove by iteration a multivariable extrapolation theorem and give a sharp bound for Calderón-Zygmund operators on L p (w) for weights in A q (q < p).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
110
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 111 publications
(114 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
4
110
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The value of the constant K(n, p, p 0 , [w] Ap ) first appeared in Dragičević, Grafakos, Pereyra, and Petermichl [98]. Another proof with sharp bounds (in terms of the characteristic constant of the weights) was given by Duoandikoetxea [101]. The present treatment of Theorem 7.5.3, based on crucial Lemma 7.5.4, was communicated to the author by J. M. Martell.…”
Section: Historical Notesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The value of the constant K(n, p, p 0 , [w] Ap ) first appeared in Dragičević, Grafakos, Pereyra, and Petermichl [98]. Another proof with sharp bounds (in terms of the characteristic constant of the weights) was given by Duoandikoetxea [101]. The present treatment of Theorem 7.5.3, based on crucial Lemma 7.5.4, was communicated to the author by J. M. Martell.…”
Section: Historical Notesmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Duoandicoetxea found recently a shorter proof of this theorem [23]. Sharp extrapolation from r = 2 is sharp for the martingale, Hilbert, Beurling-Ahlfors and Riesz transforms for all 1 < p < ∞ [21].…”
Section: Estimates In L P (W) Via Sharp Extrapolationmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Along these lines, we have to also mention the recent work [9] where a simple proof of the last result has been presented. As said in that paper, the three basic ingredients of any of the proofs of the extrapolation results are:…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…In fact, the main idea in [9] was to use a new factorization of A p 0 weights, while (ii) and (iii) were used in a standard way. We recall that the usual factorization result for A p 0 weights says that w ∈ A p 0 if, and only if, there exist u 0 , u 1 ∈ A 1 such that w = u 0 u 1−p 0 1 , while the argument in [9] uses the fact that, if w ∈ A p and u ∈ A 1 , then wu p−p 0 ∈ A p 0 , 1 ≤ p ≤ p 0 < ∞, and…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation