2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfa.2015.06.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Weighted weak-type (1,1) estimates via Rubio de Francia extrapolation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These classes of weights are closely related to the A p class introduced by Muckenhoupt in [20]. For our purposes, a fundamental property of A R p is the following [12]. Lemma 2.1.…”
Section: Theorem 13 ([4]mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…These classes of weights are closely related to the A p class introduced by Muckenhoupt in [20]. For our purposes, a fundamental property of A R p is the following [12]. Lemma 2.1.…”
Section: Theorem 13 ([4]mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…, m, and v = ν −1/ p w . Indeed, in virtue of Theorem 2.7 in [13], we have that w i ∈ A R p i , i = 1, . .…”
Section: Remarkmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Recently, E. R. P. has shown in [53] that Sawyer-type inequalities for Lorentz spaces play a fundamental role in the extension to the multi-variable setting of the restricted weak type Rubio de Francia's extrapolation presented in [13,15]. His approach suggests that Conjecture 1 will be crucial for proving multi-variable extrapolation theorems involving weights in A R P .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concerning weighted bounds for M, the above easy exercise becomes an open question when we want to characterize the weights for which M:Lp1,1false(w1false)×Lp2,1false(w2false)Lp,w1p/p1w2p/p2,and this is the question we want to address in this paper. In fact, the motivation comes from the recent restricted weak type Rubio de Francia extrapolation theory (see , ) where it has been proved that if an operator T:Lp,1false(wfalse)Lp,false(wfalse),for every wApscriptR, then endpoint (1, 1) estimates hold for characteristic functions; that is false∥TχEL1,false(ufalse)ufalse(Efalse),foralluA1,contrary to what happens with the classical Rubio de Francia theory. In this context, it has been proved in that the operator M plays in the multilinear extrapolation theory of Rubio de Francia (see ) the same role that the classical Hardy–Littlewood maximal operator plays in the linear case of this theory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…, and this is the question we want to address in this paper. In fact, the motivation comes from the recent restricted weak type Rubio de Francia extrapolation theory (see [2], [3]) where it has been proved that if an operator…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%