2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.matt.2022.10.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extraordinary tunnel electroresistance in layer-by-layer engineered van der Waals ferroelectric tunnel junctions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…HZO [41] 5.8 3.5 0.1 N/A N/A ≈10 − 3 Over 10 4 Over 10 3 BTO [42] ≈2.1 N/A 0.1 N/A N/A ≈10 −3 N/A N/A CIPS/MoS2 [45] ≈3.5 N/A 0.4 ≈10 −4 N/A N/A N/A N/A LSMO/BTO/LSMO [47] ≈3.6 N/A 0.01 N/A 35 × 10 −12 ≈10 −3 N/A N/A LSMO/BTO/LSMO [146] 3 N/A 0.01 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Ni/In2Se3/h-BN/Ni [48] ≈3.34/0.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A FGT/In2Se3/FGT [49] ≈2/≈3.34/≈2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A in the capacitor. FeRAM inevitably exhibits a destructive reading process that induces short retention time; thus, alternative device architectures, FeFET and FTJ, have been suggested as promising ferroelectric devices.…”
Section: Comparison and Benchmark Of 2d Ferroelectric Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…HZO [41] 5.8 3.5 0.1 N/A N/A ≈10 − 3 Over 10 4 Over 10 3 BTO [42] ≈2.1 N/A 0.1 N/A N/A ≈10 −3 N/A N/A CIPS/MoS2 [45] ≈3.5 N/A 0.4 ≈10 −4 N/A N/A N/A N/A LSMO/BTO/LSMO [47] ≈3.6 N/A 0.01 N/A 35 × 10 −12 ≈10 −3 N/A N/A LSMO/BTO/LSMO [146] 3 N/A 0.01 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Ni/In2Se3/h-BN/Ni [48] ≈3.34/0.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A FGT/In2Se3/FGT [49] ≈2/≈3.34/≈2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A in the capacitor. FeRAM inevitably exhibits a destructive reading process that induces short retention time; thus, alternative device architectures, FeFET and FTJ, have been suggested as promising ferroelectric devices.…”
Section: Comparison and Benchmark Of 2d Ferroelectric Devicesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, in Sections 3, 4, and 5, the three types of devices based on 2D ferroelectric materials will be discussed in detail. We note that the first (FeFET) and third (FTJ) types of devices have also employed conventional 3D ferroelectric materials (e.g., perovskite oxide materials), [ 33–49 ] but the second type (active ferroelectric channel devices) is being newly developed with emerging 2D ferroelectric materials. [ 29,50–62 ]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Over the past decade, graphene and transition metal dichalcogenides (TMDs) have attracted significant attention due to their unique properties caused by the reduced dimension. Many more two‐dimensional (2D) materials are continuing emerging with a rainbow of intriguing physical properties including excellent photoluminescence (PL) emission 1 (e.g., MoS 2 and MoSe 2 ), superconductivity 2,3 (e.g., NbS 2 and TaS 2 ), magnetism 4–6 (e.g., CrI 3 and NiPS 3 ), and ferroelectricity 7,8 (e.g., CuIn 2 PS 6 ). Moreover, stacking these 2D materials in different configurations—vertically or horizontally—leads to the formation of various homostructures and heterostructures with tunable electronic, optical, and magnetic properties 9–13 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%