2020
DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v26.i46.7312
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extrahepatic bile duct reconstruction in pigs with heterogenous animal-derived artificial bile ducts: A preliminary experience

Abstract: BACKGROUND Extrahepatic biliary duct injury (BDI) remains a complicated issue for surgeons. Although several approaches have been explored to address this problem, the high incidence of complications affects postoperative recovery. As a nonimmunogenic scaffold, an animal-derived artificial bile duct (ada-BD) could replace the defect, providing good physiological conditions for the regeneration of autologous bile duct structures without changing the original anatomical and physiologic conditions. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 20 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…37–39 In previous studies, pigs were employed as large animals to create a model of bile duct loss and explore the regeneration of the extrahepatic bile duct. 39–41 However, there are certain limitations associated with the use of pigs as experimental animals. Due to their physiological and structural characteristics, pigs have a substantial body weight and a thick subcutaneous fat layer, which poses challenges during surgical implantation and postoperative sampling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…37–39 In previous studies, pigs were employed as large animals to create a model of bile duct loss and explore the regeneration of the extrahepatic bile duct. 39–41 However, there are certain limitations associated with the use of pigs as experimental animals. Due to their physiological and structural characteristics, pigs have a substantial body weight and a thick subcutaneous fat layer, which poses challenges during surgical implantation and postoperative sampling.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%