Extraction Optimization of Mucilage from Seeds of Mimosa pudica by Response Surface Methodology

Abstract

Mimosa pudica seed mucilage (MPM) is composed of glucuronoxylan, which is a swellable, pH-responsive and non-toxic biomaterial. Herein, we aimed to extract MPM from M. pudica seeds (MP seeds) to ascertain optimization of extraction conditions to get highest yield by response surface methodology, via Box-Behnken design (RSM-BBD). MPM was extracted from MP seeds by a hot water extraction method. The effects of four different parameters on the extraction yield of MPM were evaluated: pH of the extraction medium (1–10), seed/water contact time (1–12 h), the temperature of extraction medium (30–90 °C), and seed/water ratio (1:5–1:35 w/v). The maximum yield of MPM obtained by Design-Expert software was 10.66% (10.66 g/100 g) at pH 7, seed/water contact time of 6 h, extraction temperature of 50 °C, and seed/water ratio of 1:20 w/v. The p values of ANOVA were found to be less than 0.0001, which indicated that the extraction yield of MPM was significantly affected by all the study parameters. The results revealed that pH and extraction temperature were the most significant factors affecting the yield of MPM. MPM in compressed tablet form showed pH-responsive on–off switching behavior at pH 7.4 and 1.2 in a reversible manner. MPM in compressed tablet form sustained the release of itopride for 16 h following a super case-II transport mechanism and zero-order release kinetics.

Purification, Characterization, and Anticomplementary Activity of Polysaccharides From the Fruits of Amomum tsaoko Crevost & Lemarié

“…The P -values of the “Model” and “Lack of Fit” were <.0001 and .7480, respectively, which proved that the model possessed remarkable significance and the error was negligible. 34 Also, the statistical indicators of coefficient of determination ( R 2 ), adjusted coefficient of determination (Adj R 2 ), predicted coefficient of determination (Pred R 2 ), and coefficient of variation (C.V.%) values were 0.9961, 0.9921, 0.9838, and 0.70, respectively, and the difference between Pred R 2 and Adj R 2 was 0.0083 < 0.1, which also revealed a good correlation between the predicted purification effect of ATPs and the actual purification effect. 35 The linear coefficient (X 2 ), interaction coefficient (X 1 X 4 ), and quadratic coefficients (X 1 2 , X 2 2 , X 3 2 , and X 4 2 ) on the purification of ATPs were very significant ( P < .01).…”

Maximizing the extraction yield of plant gum exudate using response surface methodology and artificial neural networking and pharmacological characterization

“…B1b2, b1b3, b1b4, b2b3, b2b4, and b3b4 are the coefficient of interactions. E is the error function of the empirical model 18 .…”

Astragalus gombo as a renewable source of cellulose: Experimental and response surface approaches

“…Therefore, the model's significance was indicated by the Model F-value of 6.29. 8,55 However, based on several previous researches, such as, 56,57 it was found that a reduced model must be used to obtain the best Response surface methodology correctly.…”