1981
DOI: 10.1080/01496398108068528
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extraction of Copper by Liquid Membranes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also the size of equipment is smaller. 40% investment savings for liquid membrane can be made as compared to solvent extraction [1]. In addition to the equipment-related advantages, there are additional advantages of using the LEM technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also the size of equipment is smaller. 40% investment savings for liquid membrane can be made as compared to solvent extraction [1]. In addition to the equipment-related advantages, there are additional advantages of using the LEM technology.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frankenfeld et al 7 reported that ELM could be up to 40% cheaper than other routine solvent extraction methods. This process combines both extraction and stripping stages to perform simultaneous purification and concentration.…”
Section: Emulsion Liquid Membrane (Elm) Was Invented By LImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…
A dvanced extraction proceses, and particularly, the liquid emulsion membrane (LEM) process, have considerable economic .potential in hydrometallurgy operations where an enrichment of the extracted metal is desired despite its low levels of concentration, (Frankenfeld et at., 1981; Weiss and Crigoriev, 1982;Hayworth et at., 1983). The LEM process involves extraction and stripping in one step.

The organic emulsion membrane provides a very large interfacial area for the transport of a given component, thereby enhancing the volumetric mass transfer rate.

…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%