2016 49th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/hicss.2016.133
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extracting Opinion Targets from Environmental Web Coverage and Social Media Streams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our research fits within the literature that investigates environmental and climate change issues using sentiment analysis (see inter alia, Codyetal2015; Hodson, Dale, and Petersen 2018;Scharl et al 2015;Sluban et al 2014Sluban et al , 2015Weichselbraun, Scharl, and Gindl 2016). Our contribution consists of testing the impacts of sentiments derived from the social network content (in particular, Twitter 2 ) related to COVID-19 on the S&P 500 Environmental and Socially Responsible Index under different time-horizons (short-, medium-and long-run).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our research fits within the literature that investigates environmental and climate change issues using sentiment analysis (see inter alia, Codyetal2015; Hodson, Dale, and Petersen 2018;Scharl et al 2015;Sluban et al 2014Sluban et al , 2015Weichselbraun, Scharl, and Gindl 2016). Our contribution consists of testing the impacts of sentiments derived from the social network content (in particular, Twitter 2 ) related to COVID-19 on the S&P 500 Environmental and Socially Responsible Index under different time-horizons (short-, medium-and long-run).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Several papers have conducted sentiment analysis or opinion mining that are employed to effectively test how positive are changes in the environment (for instance, Scharl et al 2015;Weichselbraun, Scharl, and Gindl 2016) and climate change (for example, Fernandez et al 2016;Hodson, Dale, and Petersen 2018). The majority of these studies focused on examining communications ranging from patterns to its causes and consequences.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, we deployed named entity linking for identifying stakeholders (Section 7.1), the phrase extraction method described by Weichselbraun et al [38] for tracking associations and dominant issues, and sentiment analysis (Section 7.2) to automatically determine whether the feedback was positive or negative.…”
Section: Knowledge Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Integrity Risks Monitor draws upon documents obtained from popular Austrian, German, Swiss, U.K. and U.S. media outlets that are pre-processed, analyzed and semantically enriched using methods such as part-of-speech tagging, dependency parsing [21], sentiment analysis [18], keyword analysis [20] and named entity linking [19]. In addition, we assign a score to each document that indicates its likelihood to contain coverage on integrity risks.…”
Section: Identifying Media Coverage On Integrity Risksmentioning
confidence: 99%