Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion - WWW '17 Companion 2017
DOI: 10.1145/3041021.3051153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extracting Implicit Social Relation for Social Recommendation Techniques in User Rating Prediction

Abstract: Recommendation plays an increasingly important role in our daily lives. Recommender systems automatically suggest items to users that might be interesting for them. Recent studies illustrate that incorporating social trust in Matrix Factorization methods demonstrably improves accuracy of rating prediction. Such approaches mainly use the trust scores explicitly expressed by users. However, it is often challenging to have users provide explicit trust scores of each other. There exist quite a few works, which pro… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We employ two popular metrics [26] root mean squared error (RMSE) and mean average error (MAE) as the evaluation methods, where MAE measures the average magnitude of the errors in a set of predictions while RMSE tends to disproportionately penalize large errors. is also means RMSE is more prone to be affected by outliers or bad predictions.…”
Section: Evaluation Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We employ two popular metrics [26] root mean squared error (RMSE) and mean average error (MAE) as the evaluation methods, where MAE measures the average magnitude of the errors in a set of predictions while RMSE tends to disproportionately penalize large errors. is also means RMSE is more prone to be affected by outliers or bad predictions.…”
Section: Evaluation Protocolsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ls and λ are two constants, where ls is the learning step and λ is the regularization parameter. To minimize the prediction error, the optimal experimental settings is ls = 0.01 and λ = 0.1 [28].…”
Section: Regsvdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, RSs are no longer depending on the rating matrix only for the purpose of producing an accurate personalized recommendation, but they try to make use of various kind of available data on the web. This include the users" demography [1], [2] users and items features [3], [4], tags and time [5], social relation [6], [7] contextual features [8]- [10], and geographic information [11], [12] which are somehow incorporated into the recommendation models for the purpose of improving the performance of the recommendation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%