2017
DOI: 10.1109/tpami.2016.2613866
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extracting 3D Parametric Curves from 2D Images of Helical Objects

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(41 reference statements)
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The approach is having many trigonometric and curve approximation computations involved to reach to the feature vector which reduces performance of the system. An effective representation method was proposed in [18] that makes use of both concavities and convexities of all curvature points. The multi scale convexity concavity (MCC) defines the feature for different Gaussian kernels and derived as the boundary point of each contour point of the previous level.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach is having many trigonometric and curve approximation computations involved to reach to the feature vector which reduces performance of the system. An effective representation method was proposed in [18] that makes use of both concavities and convexities of all curvature points. The multi scale convexity concavity (MCC) defines the feature for different Gaussian kernels and derived as the boundary point of each contour point of the previous level.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6 red dashed line). The centerline is calculated using the approach proposed in [35], but extended to 3D. Specifically, each coordinate of the 'centerline' is defined to be the centroid of the slice:…”
Section: E Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where Ψ i ⊂ Ω ⊂ 2 is a set of the binary segmented pixels for the i th slice (in the y-axis) in the macular hole after the cutting procedure. The centerline is then smoothed using robust local regression [36], as in the paper [35], using a smoothing parameter (in our case we choose 0.9 to represent a span of 90% of the signal). This is important as it ensures the centerline acts as a descriptor for the overall shape and direction of the hole (especially in the middle as we are not concerned about the centerline veering off at the top and base of the hole) and ensures that it remains highly insensitive to surface noise.…”
Section: E Measurementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scientists proposed different approaches in fi nding 3D helical curve from 2D data, like using generalized helicoids (Piuze et al, 2011), computing based on matching the input curve by its orthogonal projection (Cherin et al, 2014), or based on the best approximation of noisy input (Cordier et al, 2016). Willcocks et al (2016) introduced an algorithm to fi nd 3D parametric curves in three steps. In the fi rst step, they compute the main structural curve, as the main part of the computed 2D morphological skeleton.…”
Section: Algorithms In Shape Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%