2012
DOI: 10.1039/c2ay25205h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extract-free immunochromatographic assay for on-site tests of aflatoxin M1 in milk

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
12
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(39 reference statements)
1
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, the intensity of the protein absorption at 280 nm increased after centrifugation ( Figures 3B, 3D, 3F). This result is comparable with the reports of Zhao et al (2010) and Zhang et al (2012), showing a decrease of the intensity of absorbance at 280 nm caused by removal of the excess unbound Abs or BSA after the centrifugal step. Excessive proteins could not be removed, but their presence in the conjugate solution had no negative effect on the test specificity and sensitivity.…”
Section: Synthesis Of Gold Nanoparticles and Conjugation With Antibodiessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Moreover, the intensity of the protein absorption at 280 nm increased after centrifugation ( Figures 3B, 3D, 3F). This result is comparable with the reports of Zhao et al (2010) and Zhang et al (2012), showing a decrease of the intensity of absorbance at 280 nm caused by removal of the excess unbound Abs or BSA after the centrifugal step. Excessive proteins could not be removed, but their presence in the conjugate solution had no negative effect on the test specificity and sensitivity.…”
Section: Synthesis Of Gold Nanoparticles and Conjugation With Antibodiessupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Aflatoxins are scarcely extracted by hexane , and it is an effective method for removing lipids. In addition, several studies have used emulsifiers for aflatoxin analysis (Sadia et al, 2012;Zhang et al, 2012).…”
Section: Comparing Analytical Methods' Validation Values and Optimizamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cross-reaction rates for AFB 1 , AFB 2 and AFG 1 were less than 1%. The proposed method was more sensitive than the ELISA (Jiang et al, 2013;Pei, Zhang, Eremin, & Lee, 2009) and the immunochromatographic assay (Anfossi et al, 2013;Zhang et al, 2012). The CLEIA method has been successfully applied for the determination of AFM 1 in milk products and the results correlated well with the accredited ELISA method (y = 0.02x + 0.898: r = 0.9978).…”
Section: Sample Analysismentioning
confidence: 80%