“…EV use for diagnostic purposes [92,93] Methods of EV isolation are not yet fully standardized [98] Good handling [98] EVs' storage stability is not well known [98] Small size precluding pulmonary embolism if administered in a large number and favoring crossing of the BBB [99,100] The age of tissue/cell donors influences the number of ASCs, and thereby EVs, obtainable from SAT, even though the results are still conflicting [44,75,101] Low/null expression of membrane histocompatibility markers, reducing the risk of host immune responses [99] Weight of donors and the presence of metabolic pathologies can alter EVs' quality/characteristics [29,101,102] EVs carry only a fraction of the molecules produced by the cells of origin, favoring selection for specific therapeutic purposes [100] Restriction in the range of products donated by EVs compared with entire MSCs, so that the therapeutic dose and efficacy of EVs must still be clearly defined [92] Homing certain tissues depends on their source tissue, which would be mainly useful in the case of the use of EV for targeted drug delivery [33] It is not clear how extensive the EV homing ability is. [33] EVs, similar to iPSCs and unlike MSCs, should not be tumorigenic and, in selected cases, could also serve as a new anticancer tool [103][104][105] Data are still conflicting.…”