2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.snb.2019.126954
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extracellular matrix protein microarray-based biosensor with single cell resolution: Integrin profiling and characterization of cell-biomaterial interactions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 239 Bioactivity of the biomaterial can be assessed through microarray based biosensor methods. 240 These microarray based methods give insight about cell adhesion kinetics, integrin profiling, and non-specific interactions. This platform enables to perform adhesion profiling of various ECM components with multiple cell types in parallel.…”
Section: Final Characterisation To Investigate Retained Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 239 Bioactivity of the biomaterial can be assessed through microarray based biosensor methods. 240 These microarray based methods give insight about cell adhesion kinetics, integrin profiling, and non-specific interactions. This platform enables to perform adhesion profiling of various ECM components with multiple cell types in parallel.…”
Section: Final Characterisation To Investigate Retained Activitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We hypothesize that adsorbed proteins may interact with cellular receptors, especially with integrins; thus, triggering the activation of particular signal transduction pathways involved in cellular processes such as proliferation or migration [ 31 , 32 ]. Therefore, the nature and extent of this biologic response will largely depend on the integrin profile expressed by each particular cell type [ 33 ] and the layer of adsorbed proteins presented by the biomaterial surface [ 34 ]. In addition, further still-unraveled mechanisms may be responsible for cell attachment and subsequent biologic responses [ 35 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are two main techniques for the isolation of cells as single cells. On one hand, individual cells can be confined in cavities (Hosokawa et al, 2011), and on the other hand, they can be chemically guided to settle at specific locations by protein patterning techniques (Gonzalez-Pujana et al, 2019), enabling high density of single-cell arrays. Single-cell toxicity testing can provide with quantitative analysis.…”
Section: Single Cell Resolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last decades, remarkable advancements have been made in the field of microtechnology to improve analytical processes in biology, through miniaturization, for biosensing DNA (Bulyk et al, 1999;Zhang et al, 2010) and protein arrays (He et al, 2008;Ramachandran et al, 2008;Lopez-Alonso et al, 2013;Gonzalez-Pujana et al, 2019), on-chip electrophoresis (Fritzsche et al, 2010;Ou, et al, 2019), microimmunoassays (Riahi et al, 2016;Hu et al, 2017), microfluidic cell sorting (Shields et al, 2015;Vaidyanathan et al, 2018) and for cellular membrane modelling (Hirano-Iwata et al, 2010;Strulson and Maurer, 2011;Galvez et al, 2020), among others (Beebe, et al, 2002;Sackmann, et al, 2014). In fact, microtechnology enables the precise control of the topography and the surface chemistry, leading to engineered platforms for the study of cellular processes or biosensing and, at the same time, bringing advantages such as time saving, reduced costs and working space, automation of the processes, increased sensitivity and reduced volumes of the required reagents (Wurm et al, 2010;Azuaje-Hualde et al, 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%