2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.bjoms.2017.05.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extracapsular dissection in the parapharyngeal space: benefits and potential pitfalls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our analysis demonstrated that facial nerve‐dissecting modalities, in absolute numbers, remained relatively stable over the 19 years of our study: the number of PSPs increased from six to 16 cases, LP cases decreased slightly (from 15 to 10), and the number of CPs remained mostly the same (from 40 to 44). This observation points to the fact that dissection of the facial nerve retains its position and is strongly indicated in parotid surgery (diffuse unilateral multilocular cystadenolymphomas, lesions of the deep lobe, parapharyngeal lesions with broad contact to the facial nerve). It could also be seen that the rapid increase in the total number of parotidectomies (from 70 to 252) could be almost directly attributed to the increase in the number of extracapsular dissections (from 9 to 182).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our analysis demonstrated that facial nerve‐dissecting modalities, in absolute numbers, remained relatively stable over the 19 years of our study: the number of PSPs increased from six to 16 cases, LP cases decreased slightly (from 15 to 10), and the number of CPs remained mostly the same (from 40 to 44). This observation points to the fact that dissection of the facial nerve retains its position and is strongly indicated in parotid surgery (diffuse unilateral multilocular cystadenolymphomas, lesions of the deep lobe, parapharyngeal lesions with broad contact to the facial nerve). It could also be seen that the rapid increase in the total number of parotidectomies (from 70 to 252) could be almost directly attributed to the increase in the number of extracapsular dissections (from 9 to 182).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…According to the philosophy of our department, minimal invasive surgery in the form of an extracapsular dissection (ECD) was indicated in cases of a single and mobile lesion with preoperative clinical and imaging signs of a benign tumor and located within the lateral lobe of the parotid gland as well as in cases of conglomerates of cystadenolymphomas in the caudal pole of the parotid gland. Furthermore, it was performed via an extended submandibular incision in rare cases of tumors arising from the pharyngeal prolongation of the parotid gland, located within the deep parapharyngeal space and without broad contact to the lateral parotid flap, after sectioning of the posterior belly of the digastric muscle and the styloid process in most cases . Interestingly, a significant number of former literature reports, in particular, use the term “enucleation” in order to describe what could be regarded as a form of extracapsular dissection .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surgery must fulfill two criteria: complete tumor excision under good visualization and minimal functional and cosmetic adverse effects. 14,6,7,920 The transoral approach remains the most controversial, and historically, it was rather poorly applied. Its limitations include a poor view, rendering exposure of major neurovascular structures difficult; possible capsule disruption and tumor spillage; incomplete tumor removal; uncontrollable blood leakage from great vessels; and facial nerve injury.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Every effort towards reducing surgical invasiveness, e.g., avoiding nerve exposure and surgical dissection around the tumor with preservation of a cuff of healthy tissue around it (“extracapsular dissection”, Figure 2 ), was not received with open arms and encountered skepticism among several working groups [ 1 , 17 , 18 ]. Remarkably, this otherwise highly controversial surgical modality is accepted as one of the most common and undoubtedly least invasive ways of managing the same lesions in the parapharyngeal space [ 15 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 ]. In fact, extracapsular dissection in the parapharyngeal space tends to take the form of capsular dissection (or extracapsular enucleation [ 23 ]) around a large amount of surface of the PA.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the fact that numerous literature reports propose strict adherence to the surgical rule “avoid seeing the tumor capsule wherever possible” in PAs of the PG 6 , the most common approach in the management of PAs in the parapharyngeal space traditionally consists in a transcervical rather blunt dissection along the capsule of the lesion, which is equal to the so-called enucleation in the PG. Remarkably, two diametrically opposing surgical philosophies for the same histopathologic entity seem to share comparable oncologic outcomes [ 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 ]. This realization gave rise to several questions that are hidden behind the somewhat provocative title of this article: Do PAs of the PG and PS really belong to the same histologic entity?…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%