2020
DOI: 10.1038/s41563-020-0756-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extra storage capacity in transition metal oxide lithium-ion batteries revealed by in situ magnetometry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

11
298
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 454 publications
(309 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
11
298
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[ 14–16 ] Just recently, we demonstrated that the surface capacitance on metal nanoparticles involving spin‐polarized electrons is the dominant source of the extra capacity in Fe 3 O 4 LIBs. [ 17–19 ] Therefore, the possible contribution of polymeric/gel films to the unusual capacity in CoO deserves to be revisited and clarified in more details, which can foster innovations in modern battery technologies based on this new storage mechanism.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 14–16 ] Just recently, we demonstrated that the surface capacitance on metal nanoparticles involving spin‐polarized electrons is the dominant source of the extra capacity in Fe 3 O 4 LIBs. [ 17–19 ] Therefore, the possible contribution of polymeric/gel films to the unusual capacity in CoO deserves to be revisited and clarified in more details, which can foster innovations in modern battery technologies based on this new storage mechanism.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Table 3 lists a comparison of the details of capacities, Coulombic efficiencies and retention rates of all the investigated thin-film electrodes (pure references and composites). The charge capacity achieved in all the cases are higher than the theoretical capacity, which is due to the extremely thin films of active materials achieved by ALD (Mattelaer et al, 2015;Kint et al, 2019;Zhao et al, 2019;Li et al, 2020). The composite thin-films (SnO 2 -TiO 2 , SnO 2 -Fe 2 O 3 and SnO 2 -ZnO) show better electrochemical properties, either higher capacity or better retention rate than their individual counter parts (SnO 2 and TiO 2 , Fe 2 O 3 or ZnO).…”
Section: Synergistic Effect Between Sno 2 and Znomentioning
confidence: 83%
“…The discharge capacities of the fourth and fifth cycles were about 610 mAh g −1 and 580 mAh g −1 , which are also higher than the theoretical capability 560 mAh g −1 of CuS. This extra capacity has been widely observed transition metal compounds [ 56 ], which can be attributed to the formation/decomposition of polymeric gel-like films around the transition metal particles [ 57 ], the interface lithium storage [ 58 , 59 ], and the surface conversion of LiOH to Li2O and LiH [ 60 ]. In the following cycles, the curves tended to overlap, which showed the outstanding cyclic stability of the CuS/Cu 1.8 S nanocomposites.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%