2018
DOI: 10.1177/1120700018782667
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

External snapping hip: a systematic review of outcomes following surgical intervention: External snapping hip systematic review

Abstract: We found operative treatment for external snapping hip to be both safe and efficacious for returning patients to their pre-injury activities. When recurrence does occur, it often is painless and does not require revision surgery. Future studies should be larger and evaluate different surgical techniques to further elucidate the safety and efficacy of surgical treatment for external snapping hip.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A stretching program specific to the ITB and the iliopsoas muscles is indicated, and local corticosteroids injections and physical therapies, as laser therapy and extracorporeal shockwave therapy ESWT, can be useful to manage the pain [ 3 ]. The conservative treatment should be continued for at least 6 months [ 8 ]. Then, if the patient does not respond to a well-conduced conservative program, surgery is indicated.…”
Section: State Of the Current Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A stretching program specific to the ITB and the iliopsoas muscles is indicated, and local corticosteroids injections and physical therapies, as laser therapy and extracorporeal shockwave therapy ESWT, can be useful to manage the pain [ 3 ]. The conservative treatment should be continued for at least 6 months [ 8 ]. Then, if the patient does not respond to a well-conduced conservative program, surgery is indicated.…”
Section: State Of the Current Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Current literature shows that endoscopic procedures are superior in terms of complication profile, recurrence rate, aesthetic results and patient’s satisfaction [ 4 ]. The most common endoscopic techniques for the treatment of ESHS are diamond-shaped ITB release over the greater trochanter and the release of the femoral insertion of the gluteus maximus tendon [ 5 , 8 , 9 ]. To provide a better comprehension of the different techniques described in literature, we divided the treatment options into two groups according to the surgical approach and strategy: inside–out or outside–in.…”
Section: State Of the Current Evidencementioning
confidence: 99%
“…They include lengthening, 12 mostly by Z‐plasty, 13–16 release, 9,11 partial resection, 17,18 and sectioning 10 of the ITB. These procedures, all performed under general anesthesia, provide similar results, but a significant recurrence rate of up to 29% has been shown 19,20 . Indeed, snapping hip is an active phenomenon that cannot be tested intraoperatively under general anesthesia.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As external snapping hip is the most common form of palpable or auditory movement around the hip joints [21], and an often-encountered reason for patients to present in the outpatient clinic, there is an increased interest in sports medicine research to further investigate the aetiology and treatment approach of this condition [22][23][24]. It was therefore the purpose of this retrospective regression analysis to look for predisposing bony morphological factors that may lead to developing the current condition, as there are no studies to our knowledge that investigated that.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, an escalation with an ultrasound-guided corticosteroid injection can be considered for a quick pain relief [32] to enable patients to undergo physical therapy [33]. Despite all the above-mentioned efforts, surgical treatment may be necessary when conservative treatment and corticosteroid injection fail [22]. Surgical interventions aim at lengthening of the iliotibial band.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%