2004
DOI: 10.1159/000326279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

External Quality Assurance for Cervical Cytology in Developing Countries

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All women with positive results were treated. The program successfully reached its objectives: improve coverage, screening, and follow-up of CC in high-risk populations (42). This scheme allowed, among others, for more equity in access to health services and increased service use by vulnerable groups (42).…”
Section: Grey Literature Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All women with positive results were treated. The program successfully reached its objectives: improve coverage, screening, and follow-up of CC in high-risk populations (42). This scheme allowed, among others, for more equity in access to health services and increased service use by vulnerable groups (42).…”
Section: Grey Literature Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study indicates that in Mexico, implementation of accreditation standards for cytotechnicians is urgently needed. Both the introduction of external quality control mechanisms in cervical cytology laboratories and improved training of cytotechnicians are also necessary (59). In Mexico, a consensus must be established among healthcare decision-makers, administrators, and providers in terms of the need for quality control mechanisms, standardization of diagnosis, periodic certification, and continuing education for personnel working in cervical cytology laboratories (60).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Failures of new cervical cytology programmes usually relate to failure to achieve adequate quality in one or more components of the programme (Salvetto and Sandiford, 2004). Miller (2002) has pointed out that it is not usually the test itself which has failed, but other components of the programme such as failure to reach the target population and adequate recruitment, communication of results and failure to follow up.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%