2016
DOI: 10.3390/w8110538
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extent of Stream Burial and Relationships to Watershed Area, Topography, and Impervious Surface Area

Abstract: Stream burial-the routing of streams through culverts, pipes, and concrete lined channels, or simply paving them over-is common during urbanization, and disproportionately affects small, headwater streams. Burial undermines the physical and chemical processes governing life in streams, with consequences for water quality and quantity that may amplify from headwaters to downstream receiving waters. Knowledge of the extent of stream burial is critical for understanding cumulative impacts to stream networks, and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stream burial is a pervasive problem in urban environments, with burial rates exceeding 40% for the very smallest streams (catchment area~1 ha; Weitzell, Kaushal, Lynch, Guinn, & Elmore, 2016). Stream burial is a pervasive problem in urban environments, with burial rates exceeding 40% for the very smallest streams (catchment area~1 ha; Weitzell, Kaushal, Lynch, Guinn, & Elmore, 2016).…”
Section: Removal In Small Versus Large Streamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Stream burial is a pervasive problem in urban environments, with burial rates exceeding 40% for the very smallest streams (catchment area~1 ha; Weitzell, Kaushal, Lynch, Guinn, & Elmore, 2016). Stream burial is a pervasive problem in urban environments, with burial rates exceeding 40% for the very smallest streams (catchment area~1 ha; Weitzell, Kaushal, Lynch, Guinn, & Elmore, 2016).…”
Section: Removal In Small Versus Large Streamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simulated decreases in drainage density are analogous to stream burial in actual catchments. Stream burial is a pervasive problem in urban environments, with burial rates exceeding 40% for the very smallest streams (catchment area~1 ha; Weitzell, Kaushal, Lynch, Guinn, & Elmore, 2016). Buried streams, even if they are flowing, have lower rates of N uptake; 15 N-NO À 3 uptake experiments in buried stream showed 30-fold longer uptake lengths relative to surface streams (Beaulieu et al, 2014).…”
Section: Removal In Small Versus Large Streamsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Increasingly, there is a need to connect the fate of summer stream flow to land use practices (e.g., Price et al, ; Reed et al, ; Strauch et al, ; Sun et al, ; Weitzell et al, ), including water extraction (e.g., Arroita et al, ), as well as anticipated climate change (e.g., Asarian & Walker, ). In the Northern California Coast Ranges specifically, rapid expansion of cannabis cultivation is putting extreme pressure on summer water resources (e.g., Bauer et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based exclusively on the overall accuracy reports, the DELSMA model proved to be a more efficient method for extracting impervious surface. Our study will provide a reliable method of impervious surface estimation for the urban planner and management in monitoring urban expansion, revealing urban heat island, and estimating urban surface runoff, using time-series Landsat imagery.Sustainability 2019, 11, 6227 2 of 18 waterlogging [8,9], and water quality deterioration [10][11][12]. The spatial distribution of impervious surface is not only an important characteristic of the urbanization process, but also a critical indicator for urban ecological environment quality evaluation [13][14][15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sustainability 2019, 11, 6227 2 of 18 waterlogging [8,9], and water quality deterioration [10][11][12]. The spatial distribution of impervious surface is not only an important characteristic of the urbanization process, but also a critical indicator for urban ecological environment quality evaluation [13][14][15].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%