2012
DOI: 10.1109/tasc.2011.2178217
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extensive Characterization of the 1 mm PIT <formula formulatype="inline"><tex Notation="TeX">${\rm Nb}_{3}{\rm Sn}$</tex></formula> Strand for the 13-T FRESCA2 Magnet

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
17
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
2
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This justifies equation (18), suggesting that the proper quantity for scaling is the elastic energy.…”
Section: A Relation Between the Exponential Strain Function And The E...supporting
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This justifies equation (18), suggesting that the proper quantity for scaling is the elastic energy.…”
Section: A Relation Between the Exponential Strain Function And The E...supporting
confidence: 71%
“…In this paper the new strain function is presented together with the results obtained by applying the new scaling function to a number of relevant datasets. The data analyzed consist of critical current measurements at 4.2 K that were carried out under applied axial strain at Durham University [15] and at the University of Geneva [16][17][18] on different strand types. From the critical current measured at a certain applied strain and at various magnetic fields, the B c2 (4.2 K, ε a ) was calculated using a procedure described in the paper.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since Ũ is an increasing function of strain, this formula yields a bell-shaped curve as a function of strain, consistently with experiments. 14,16 Our model yields the functional form 1/ cosh[(B Ũ) 1/2 ] β , with B a constant, and β a number of order one. Both forms agree at small Ũ, provided A = β B/2, but the second form drops exponentially, rather than polynomially, at large Ũ.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The average residual resistivity ratio (RRR) was measured between 84 and 125 for extracted strands. Despite this relatively low RRR, measurements on short samples have shown that the stability current in both PIT and RRP extracted strands was at least twice the operating current, which was deemed sufficient not to affect the magnet's performance (Bordini et al 2012;Oberli 2013). Cable cross-sections are shown in Fig.…”
Section: Strand and Cable Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The critical current is measured on virgin (round) strands and strands extracted from cables using short samples (Rochepault et al 2017). Measurements have been performed at 4.3 K and the data has been fitted by parameterization curves (Bordini et al 2012) and extrapolated to 1.9 K. The degradation due to cabling, deducted from the comparison between virgin and extracted strand measurements, has been found to be on average between 2% and 5%. Figure 12.6 illustrates the estimates for the short sample limit (SSL) current I ss and peak field on the coil B peak based on the computed load lines and the critical line 16.5 17 17.5 18 18.5…”
Section: Short Sample Limits and Load Linesmentioning
confidence: 99%