2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.dsp.2016.05.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extensions of the CBMeMBer filter for joint detection, tracking, and classification of multiple maneuvering targets

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If only the position measurements are received, the target class can be determined based on the kinematic state estimation [52]. Assume that the class-dependent model sets are different, the posterior probabilities of target classes can be obtained based on the measurement likelihoods given different motion models [53,54]. In [55], different target classes correspond to different acceleration model sets, and the target class is determined based on the acceleration estimates.…”
Section: Multi-target Jtc Based On Kinematic Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If only the position measurements are received, the target class can be determined based on the kinematic state estimation [52]. Assume that the class-dependent model sets are different, the posterior probabilities of target classes can be obtained based on the measurement likelihoods given different motion models [53,54]. In [55], different target classes correspond to different acceleration model sets, and the target class is determined based on the acceleration estimates.…”
Section: Multi-target Jtc Based On Kinematic Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The target attribute measurement is introduced in the calculation of the likelihood function to derive the multitarget posterior density. In [17,18], the class information is extended to the target state vector, and an extended classdependent multi-target state distribution is then obtained using a PHD filter. In [19], an approximate sequential PHD filtering method is adopted for multi-sensor multi-target JDTC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, knowledge of the target class provides valuable information on the possible kinematic behaviors of the target [8] (e.g., a fighter aircraft can perform sharper maneuvers than a cargo aircraft) which, in turn, can be profitably exploited to improve tracking performance [9]. The recent development of random finite set (RFS) methods has produced several interesting contributions to joint detection, tracking and classification (JDTC) of both a single and multiple targets [10,11,12,13,14,15,16] but all based on a single-sensor system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These RFS based trackers are integrated approaches for multi-target joint detection and tracking, and provide the approximated multi-target density with association uncertainty. Compared to traditional approaches [ 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 ], the multi-target joint detection, tracking and classification problem is also solved using multi-model PHD/CPHD [ 1 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 ] and CMeMBer filter [ 29 ]. However, due to track information of the RFS based filters can not be obtained directly, these algorithms only calculate the class-dependent multi-target density without the explicit classification results for each target.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%