2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.06.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extension of the hybrid force/displacement (HFD) seismic design method to 3D steel moment-resisting frame buildings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Corresponding to the performance levels, the maximum interstory drift of the frame is compared to the target values of ASCE41-13 [39] in each iteration. e repeat operation continues until the expected values are reached and then stops [14]. e appropriate coefficient for different performance levels is calculated using the Bayesian method.…”
Section: Near-fault Recordsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Corresponding to the performance levels, the maximum interstory drift of the frame is compared to the target values of ASCE41-13 [39] in each iteration. e repeat operation continues until the expected values are reached and then stops [14]. e appropriate coefficient for different performance levels is calculated using the Bayesian method.…”
Section: Near-fault Recordsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e appropriate coefficient for different performance levels is calculated using the Bayesian method. is process is performed for a specific performance level based on the flowchart shown in Figure 4 for a single earthquake [14].…”
Section: Near-fault Recordsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These methods have an additional disadvantage of requiring a designed structure for adopting the SDOF representation for analysis, and thus they cannot be used for the design of new structures and are limited to the assessment and evaluation of the seismic performance of already existing structures. To combine the advantages of the FBD and DBD methods while still conforming to practical design formats and additionally minimize iterations, a group of researchers have proposed a "hybrid force/displacement based design" (HFDD) for design of steel frames and have developed the method over the past 15 years specifically for performancebased engineering applications [6][7][8][9][10]. The core idea of this methodology is that it starts by transforming target values of the inter-storey drift ratio (IDR), as an indicator of non-structural damage, to a target roof displacement, and then calculates the appropriate force reduction factor (FRF) required for limiting ductility demands to those of the estimated target roof displacement ductility.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, the hybrid force/displacement (HFD) seismic design method, which follows the PBD philosophy, has been developed for steel plane and space frames by Karavasilis at al [13] and Tzimas et al [14,15]. This method appropriately combines advantages and eliminates or reduces disadvantages of both FBD and DBD seismic design methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%