In this paper, the use of a recently proposed seismic design method called Hybrid force/displacement design is evaluated as an option for preliminary design of RC frames in the context of the latest framework for performance-based seismic design. A prototype RC frame is chosen as a design case study and is designed twice: using the traditional code method which is force-based and using the modified design procedure. The two designs are compared based on the number of iterations required, and the expected performance in reference to the results of nonlinear time-history analysis as the closest approximation of actual behaviour. It is concluded that the modified Hybrid method has higher efficiency and reliability in achieving targeted performance of RC frames, and thus is suitable for application in performance-based seismic design.
The use of the reduced-force-amplified-displacement method in seismic design provisions, has served the practice well with the benefits of simplicity and smaller resulting cross-sections. However, the inherent inconsistency in the magnitudes assigned to the displacement amplification factor (DAF) -used in this method to estimate inelastic displacement -presents a need for reliable calibration of its value. This is especially important since estimates of maximum displacement are used in several serviceability and life-safety checks during the seismic design process. To address this need, a comparative assessment is carried out on numerical models of low-to mid-rise reinforced-concrete moment frames in 3 different seismic zones covering the range of seismicity in Egypt, namely 0.1g, 0.15g and 0.3g PGA. Drift results of the equivalent static load analysis method are compared to those of nonlinear time-history analysis using a suite of seven ground motions for each scenario. A commercial package for fiberelement-modeling is used to conduct 224 dynamic analyses. Code specified lower and upper bounds on design acceleration and fundamental period, respectively, are also addressed together with their implications on bridging the gap between the drift values calculated from both types of analyses. The results demonstrate that abiding by the Egyptian code default value of DAF, together with the imposed bounds on the calculated base shear, results in overconservatism in drift estimates, with the exception of single-storey frames. By applying the recommendation of ignoring these code bounds, the study proposes some values of DAF to be used for the different categories of frames and seismic zones investigated, for more reliable and accurate prediction of displacement performance.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.