“…Determination of allowable daily intake of potentially genotoxic impurities in drug substance or drug product is based on an understanding of dose-response relationships for carcinogenicity observed for several hundred compounds positive in chronic rodent bioassays. There was remarkable consistency among several efforts that defined cancer potency curves for rodent carcinogenicity studies (Ashby and Tennant, 1988;Fiori and Meyerhoff, 2002;Gold et al, 1984Gold et al, , 1989Munro et al, 1999;Rulis, 1986).…”
Section: Presumed Genotoxic Carcinogen Without Animal Cancer Data: Usmentioning
“…Determination of allowable daily intake of potentially genotoxic impurities in drug substance or drug product is based on an understanding of dose-response relationships for carcinogenicity observed for several hundred compounds positive in chronic rodent bioassays. There was remarkable consistency among several efforts that defined cancer potency curves for rodent carcinogenicity studies (Ashby and Tennant, 1988;Fiori and Meyerhoff, 2002;Gold et al, 1984Gold et al, , 1989Munro et al, 1999;Rulis, 1986).…”
Section: Presumed Genotoxic Carcinogen Without Animal Cancer Data: Usmentioning
“…In contrast to the TTC values and supporting analyses discussed above, Fiori and Meyerhoff recently conducted their own analysis of the distribution of TD50s from GoldÕs CPDB in an effort to develop de minimis levels for mutagens and carcinogens (Fiori and Meyerhoff, 2002). In their analysis, a target risk level (risk-specific dose (RSD)) was selected that corresponds to a de minimis excess lifetime cancer risk of one-in-a-million at the 95th percentile of the distribution of cancer potencies, assuming all compounds are carcinogenic.…”
Section: Regulatory Precedents For Carcinogensmentioning
“…Toxicology assessment should be done by pharmaceutical scientists and toxicologists to identify PGIs and their entry into the synthetic process . In addition, the synthetic route must be reviewed by a team of process chemists, analytical chemists, and toxicologists to identify likely reaction byproducts and their potential for carry through to the APIs.…”
Potential genotoxic impurities in pharmaceuticals at trace levels are of increasing concern to both pharmaceutical industries and regulatory agencies due to their possibility for human carcinogenesis. Molecular functional groups that render starting materials and synthetic intermediates as reactive building blocks for small molecules may also be responsible for their genotoxicity. Determination of these genotoxic impurities at trace levels requires highly sensitive and selective analytical methodologies, which poses tremendous challenges on analytical communities in pharmaceutical research and development. Experimental guidance for the analytical determination of some important classes of genotoxic impurities is still unavailable in the literature. Therefore, the present review explores the structural alerts of commonly encountered potential genotoxic impurities, draft guidance of various regulatory authorities in order to control the level of impurities in drug substances and to assess their toxicity. This review also describes the analytical considerations for the determination of potential genotoxic impurities at trace levels and finally few case studies are also discussed for the determination of some important classes of potential genotoxic impurities. It is the authors' intention to provide a complete strategy that helps analytical scientists for the analysis of such potential genotoxic impurities in pharmaceuticals.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.