2007
DOI: 10.1007/s10514-007-9062-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extending obstacle avoidance methods through multiple parameter-space transformations

Abstract: Obstacle avoidance methods approach the problem of mobile robot autonomous navigation by steering the robot in real-time according to the most recent sensor readings, being suitable to dynamic or unknown environments. However, real-time performance is commonly gained by ignoring the robot shape and some or all of its kinematic restrictions which may lead to poor navigation performance in many practical situations.In this paper we propose a framework where a kinematically constrained and any-shape robot is tran… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0
3

Year Published

2010
2010
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
49
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Confirming the effectiveness of mentioned algorithm [9] In the research, we use the platform of autonomous mobile robot to do obstacle avoidance experiment. In the experiment, we use three cartons and one finishing tank as the obstacles.…”
Section: Divide Of Multi-sensor Information Fusion Levelmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Confirming the effectiveness of mentioned algorithm [9] In the research, we use the platform of autonomous mobile robot to do obstacle avoidance experiment. In the experiment, we use three cartons and one finishing tank as the obstacles.…”
Section: Divide Of Multi-sensor Information Fusion Levelmentioning
confidence: 59%
“…Well-known reactive formulations include the dynamic window approach [3] and inevitable collision states [5], in addition to velocity obstacles [2]. Some approaches use a number of predefined discrete behaviors [10] or parameter space transformations [11]. Multiple robots may cooperate implicitly or by broadcasting their future intentions [12] or with limited bidirectional communication [13].…”
Section: A Local and Reactive Navigationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The TP-space was introduced in [8] as a generalization of space transformations that abstract the kinematics and shape of non-holonomic vehicles [21]. The basic idea behind those works is that the robot C-space can be partly charted by means of 2D manifolds in the parameter space of a family of trajectories (TP-space) -refer to Fig.…”
Section: Tp-space and Trajectory Generatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such efficiency comes at a cost: planners may require a few seconds to generate a result for typical office-like navigation scenarios. This is in contrast to the ability of reactive methods to quickly respond to any dynamic change sensed in the environment, typically within one millisecond [8]. Current architectures for autonomous navigation tend to fuse global (planned) and local (reactive) methods, e.g., ROS navigation [9] and MoveIt!…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%