2021
DOI: 10.1017/cjn.2021.219
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extended Window Thrombolysis in Acute Spinal Cord Ischemia – ERRATUM

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Seven (44%) of the 16 patients had a good recovery (mRS 0-2). The outcome in the delayed time window (beyond 270 minutes) was good in two out of three patients (mRS 1 at 11 months, mRS 2 at three months, and mRS 3 at three months in our patient [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Seven (44%) of the 16 patients had a good recovery (mRS 0-2). The outcome in the delayed time window (beyond 270 minutes) was good in two out of three patients (mRS 1 at 11 months, mRS 2 at three months, and mRS 3 at three months in our patient [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%