2009
DOI: 10.1021/ef900994k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Extended Application of the Moving Flame Front Model for Combustion of a Carbon Particle with a Finite-Rate Homogenous Reaction

Abstract: The moving flame front (MFF) model with the assumption of an infinitely fast homogeneous reaction was successfully extended to use in the finite-rate cases, applying the concept of "characteristic combustion rate of CO relative to its generation" and a universal "effectiveness-transforming formula". The predictions by the amended MFF model agree well with those by the rigid continuous-film model, no matter what kinetics of the homogeneous reaction are taken and no matter what the particle diameters are. In add… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
8
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
2
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Fig.8(b), it can also be observed that the peak soot volume fraction increases from 9×10 −6 , to 10.8×10 −6 and 11.2×10 −6 , as the velocity is decreased from 15, to 2.0, and 1.2 cm/s, respectively. In addition, the value and the distribution of soot volume fraction obtained by the simulation are similar to those from the experiment [23]. This is attributed to the reduced radially inward flow velocity with decreasing the coflow air velocity and the enhanced residence time.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…In Fig.8(b), it can also be observed that the peak soot volume fraction increases from 9×10 −6 , to 10.8×10 −6 and 11.2×10 −6 , as the velocity is decreased from 15, to 2.0, and 1.2 cm/s, respectively. In addition, the value and the distribution of soot volume fraction obtained by the simulation are similar to those from the experiment [23]. This is attributed to the reduced radially inward flow velocity with decreasing the coflow air velocity and the enhanced residence time.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 76%
“…The three heterogeneous reactions, as listed below, were assumed to occur at the particle external surface with first-order global Arrhenius kinetics . The overall carbon consumption rate equals the sum of the rates from each individual surface reaction normalC false( normals false) + 0.5 normalO 2 CO normalC false( normals false) + CO 2 2 CO normalC false( normals false) + normalH 2 normalO CO + normalH 2 q = prefix∑ j = 1 3 q j = P normalg , normalO 2 1 K normalS , 1 + 1 K normald , 1 + P normalg , CO 2 1 K normalS , 2 + 1 K normald , 2 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 The overall carbon consumption rate equals the sum of the rates from each individual surface reaction. 39 + → C 0.5O CO (s) 2…”
Section: ■ Experimental Sectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Surface reactions, as listed in Table 4, are solved in the CFD code by using first-order global Arrhenius kinetics [7] and the multiple surface reactions model [1]. Sum of the carbon consumption rates from each individual surface reaction equals to the total carbon consumption rate at the computational volume [17]. …”
Section: Numerical Model Of the Eafmentioning
confidence: 99%