2005
DOI: 10.1002/hed.20258
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expression of PCNA, p53, Bax, and Bcl-X in oral poorly differentiated and basaloid squamous cell carcinoma: Relationships with prognosis

Abstract: These results suggest that the clinical and biologic course of BSCC is similar to PDSCC in the oral cavity when clinical stage and site are matched.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

5
32
0
8

Year Published

2008
2008
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(77 reference statements)
5
32
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results suggest that p53 have an important role in carcinogenesis either in SCC or in BSCC, and that there is no statistical significant difference in the expression of this protein in the two variants analyzed. This result is similar to other studies of oral cavity [18,19] and other lesions of the head and neck [26] and different from the results of Imamhasan et al [27] that found higher frequency of abnormal p53 expression in BSCC when compared to well-differentiated SCC; however, in their study, it was evaluated as esophagus squamous cell carcinoma. Corroborating our studies, recent data show the high prevalence of abnormal p53 expression in oral cavity SCC [16,28].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results suggest that p53 have an important role in carcinogenesis either in SCC or in BSCC, and that there is no statistical significant difference in the expression of this protein in the two variants analyzed. This result is similar to other studies of oral cavity [18,19] and other lesions of the head and neck [26] and different from the results of Imamhasan et al [27] that found higher frequency of abnormal p53 expression in BSCC when compared to well-differentiated SCC; however, in their study, it was evaluated as esophagus squamous cell carcinoma. Corroborating our studies, recent data show the high prevalence of abnormal p53 expression in oral cavity SCC [16,28].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…The prognostic value of p53 expression in SCC is still controversial; some believe that high expression is associated with poor survival [15], while others did not find this association [16,17]. Additionally, few studies investigated the p53 protein in BSCC exclusively of oral cavity [18,19]. These studies showed high prevalence of p53 abnormal expression, but did not find association with prognosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numbers of patients with BSCC in these studies ranged from 4 to 49 (median, 10 patients). Eleven of these studies suggest that patients with BSCC have a worse prognosis, 1,2,10,11,13,15,18,20,[24][25][26] whereas the remaining studies either suggest that the behavior of BSCC is not different from SCC, 5,12,14,16,17,[21][22][23]27,28 or did not address the issue of comparative prognosis. 19,29 The common factor suggesting that BSCC has a worse prognosis in these studies has been the pro- pensity for BSCC to present in advanced stages and to have higher rates of hematogenous spread.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Highlighting the difficulties in selecting the best treatment for BSCC, biologic molecular patterns may provide some clues. Promising cell cycle markers, 14,29,33,34 apoptosis, differentiation, stem cells, and loss of heterozygosity 35 may provide directions for better treatment selection in the near future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In agreement with earlier studies, the tumor cells in our case stained negative for P53, chromogranin, synaptophysin while positive for CK AE1/AE3 and EMA. The aggressive natural behavior of BSCC has been generally related to early recurrence, lymph node involvement and also distant metastasis to the liver and lung (18). Lymphatic involvement was not observed in our patient.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 46%