“…The most likely explanation for the greater resistance to anaesthesia of carious dentine compared with normal dentine is that, as a result of inflammatory changes in the pulp associated with the caries, Na+ channels of a type that are not sensitive to lignocaine were expressed in the nerve terminals and that these continued to support the propagation of action potentials despite the presence of the anaesthetic. [7][8][9][10][11] There are several other possible explanations: for example, the dentine under the caries is likely to have been less permeable to the lignocaine than the normal dentine due to the presence of secondary and tertiary dentine. The hydraulic conductance of dentine under a carious lesion has been shown to be much lower than that of normal dentine.…”