2001
DOI: 10.1053/jhep.2001.21996
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expression and matrix deposition of latent transforming growth factor β binding proteins in normal and fibrotic rat liver and transdifferentiating hepatic stellate cells in culture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
27
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
2
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The value of serum TGF-β1 levels has certain limitations, including the potential contamination of samples by TGF-β1 from platelets, interference by plasmin activity in the plasma that increases the amount of TGF-β1, the binding of TGF-β1 to the ECM and vascular endothelium at sites of injury, sequestration by soluble proteins and the complicated clearance of TGF-β1. These factors explain why plasma levels of TGF-β1 are unlikely to be of diagnostic value (Breitkopf et al 2001). In agreement with these observations and in parallel with our study, serum TGF-β1 levels showed no statistically significant differences among fibrosis stages in paediatric patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The value of serum TGF-β1 levels has certain limitations, including the potential contamination of samples by TGF-β1 from platelets, interference by plasmin activity in the plasma that increases the amount of TGF-β1, the binding of TGF-β1 to the ECM and vascular endothelium at sites of injury, sequestration by soluble proteins and the complicated clearance of TGF-β1. These factors explain why plasma levels of TGF-β1 are unlikely to be of diagnostic value (Breitkopf et al 2001). In agreement with these observations and in parallel with our study, serum TGF-β1 levels showed no statistically significant differences among fibrosis stages in paediatric patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In hepatic pathology, TGF-β1 is the most important stimulus for the production of ECM by HSCs (Sasaki et al 1992) and is also an inhibitor of hepatocyte growth and proliferation (Nakamura et al 1985). In liver biopsies from patients with chronic liver disease, TGF-β1 levels are correlated with type I collagen mRNA (Breitkopf et al 2001). The value of serum TGF-β1 levels has certain limitations, including the potential contamination of samples by TGF-β1 from platelets, interference by plasmin activity in the plasma that increases the amount of TGF-β1, the binding of TGF-β1 to the ECM and vascular endothelium at sites of injury, sequestration by soluble proteins and the complicated clearance of TGF-β1.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ut-PA regulates matrix degradation (45) and is involved in inflammation and angiogenesis (14). Plasmin generated by ut-PA is required for the release of active TGF-␤ 1 from its latent form bound to the latency-associated peptide (9). Finally, downregulation of TIMP-1 in the subgroup of patients with improvement in liver fibrosis is in agreement with previous reports on the effects of AT1 receptor blockers in experimental models of liver injury (21,22).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…In contrast activated HSCs (7 days in culture) are not equally responsive to TGF-β [15]. Furthermore, increased expression of TGF-β and constitutively phosphorylated Smad3 in activated HSCs indicate autocrine stimulation [16][17][18][19]. Since TGF-β also induces Smad7 expression in quiescent HSCs, a tightly controlled TGF-β signaling is anticipated, whereas lack of Smad7 expression in autocrine activated MFBs could be relevant for the pathogenesis of progressive liver fibrosis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%