2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2016.05.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Expression and characterization of alkaline protease from the metagenomic library of tannery activated sludge

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The obtained k m values are quite low compared to most of microbial proteases (0.3-19.2 g/l) [1,3,18,19].…”
Section: Determination Of the Molecular Mass Of Peptidase From B Tmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The obtained k m values are quite low compared to most of microbial proteases (0.3-19.2 g/l) [1,3,18,19].…”
Section: Determination Of the Molecular Mass Of Peptidase From B Tmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Various results were obtained regarding the best linearization method in kinetics studies of protease-catalyzed casein hydrolysis. Devi S.G. et al in their research of alkaline protease from activated sludge of a tannery, considered the Eadie-Hofstee method to be optimal, while the Lineweaver-Burk equation resulted in sig-nificant standard errors [3]. Yoshii et al, studying the kinetics of two proteases, obtained similar values for the kinetic constants, determined by the Lineweaver-Burk and Hanes methods.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On the other hand, LipM protein sequence exhibited 48% identity with the Alpha/beta hydrolase AS‐Trib12 belonging to an uncultured bacterium. Although these homology analyses were carried out with proteins that were identified from already reported domains, it is surprising to observe identity values even much lower than those observed for novel enzymes recovered in functional assays (67–92% identity with >90% query cover) (Biver, Portetelle, & Vandenbol, ; Devi et al., ). This result highlights even more the impact of the current approach to identify hidden novel enzymes from metagenomic samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these homology analyses were carried out with proteins that were identified from already reported domains, it is surprising to observe identity values even much lower than those observed for novel enzymes recovered in functional assays (67-92% identity with >90% query cover) (Biver, Portetelle, & Vandenbol, 2013;Devi et al, 2016).…”
Section: Recovery Of Enzymatic Activities and Characterizationmentioning
confidence: 96%