2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1754-4505.2006.tb01434.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exposure to the oral side effects of medication in a community-based sample

Abstract: This descriptive study assessed the self-reported medications taken by 1,163 European-American and Mexican-American community-dwelling adults (age range 32 to 81 years of age) from the Oral Health: San Antonio Longitudinal Study of Aging (OH:SALSA) sample and reports on the potential oral side effects (OSE) of their medications. Data collection included sociodemographic characteristics, number of prescription and non-prescription drugs, and frequency of potential OSE. Medications were checked in three drug ref… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
14
0
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
14
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Only 75 of the 531 patients (14.1%) with CVD had clinically detectable or recorded oral symptoms or signs that might represent an adverse reaction to a CVD. The most frequent oral symptom was xerostomia in 40 subjects (7.5%), which is already known to be a likely oral adverse effect of many groups of drugs (Smith and Burtner, 1994; Shinkai et al , 2006). However, the presently observed frequency is far below the 80.5% reported in some studies of patients receiving other drug therapies (Smith and Burtner, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Only 75 of the 531 patients (14.1%) with CVD had clinically detectable or recorded oral symptoms or signs that might represent an adverse reaction to a CVD. The most frequent oral symptom was xerostomia in 40 subjects (7.5%), which is already known to be a likely oral adverse effect of many groups of drugs (Smith and Burtner, 1994; Shinkai et al , 2006). However, the presently observed frequency is far below the 80.5% reported in some studies of patients receiving other drug therapies (Smith and Burtner, 1994).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some medications can predispose patients to several oral mucosal lesions such as erythema multiforme or lichenoid lesions, mucositis, angioedema, perioral dermatitis, cheilitis, desquamation of the mucosa, glossitis etc. and discolouration of the oral tissues 4,7 . In this study, the rates of oral mucosal lesions, lichenoid reaction and oral pigmentation were higher in the medication group than control group, but it was not statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, it is defined as: (a) Occasional plasma glucose ≥200 mg/dl (additional to polyuria, polydipsia, and unexplained weight loss); (b) Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) ≥126 mg/dl, (c) Plasma glucose 2 hr after oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) ≥200 mg/dl (Alberti & Zimmet, ). It is suggested that those patients with uncontrolled DM present an increased susceptibility to the development of fungal infections such as candidiasis (Guggenheimer et al, ; Krishnan, ; Manzano‐Gayosso et al, ), mainly when associated with other local alterations such as the use of removable dental prosthesis (Dorocka‐Bobkowska et al, ) and decreased salivary secretion (Sousa, Costa, & Roncalli, ), which have been found in some studies to be associated with the use of certain medication, such as diuretic and antihypertensive drugs, commonly used among diabetic patients (Noboru Kuroiwa et al, ; Shinkai, Hatch, Schmidt, & Sartori, ). DM has also been associated with bacterial diseases, like gingivitis and periodontitis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%