1970
DOI: 10.1288/00005537-197004000-00004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exposure of the facial nerve in parotid surgery. (Use of the tympanomastoid fissure as a guide)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

1971
1971
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The FN is one of the most critical structures encountered during surgical extirpation of the parotid gland especially since these closely approximate the nerve [139]. Table 7 shows the incidence rates reported in the literature for FN paralysis (transient or permanent).…”
Section: Operative Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FN is one of the most critical structures encountered during surgical extirpation of the parotid gland especially since these closely approximate the nerve [139]. Table 7 shows the incidence rates reported in the literature for FN paralysis (transient or permanent).…”
Section: Operative Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The tympanomastoid suture is a more xed landmark to identify the facial nerve. In many studies, it is accepted as one of the best landmarks due to its xed position and close relationship with the stylomandibular foramen [7,8]. However, the use of this suture as a landmark has some disadvantages: it requires periosteal elevation, and the dense sternocleidomastoid muscle tendon structure adhering to the mastoid tip covers the tympanomastoid suture [9][10][11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 Although the styloid process has the advantage of being very close to the facial nerve, it has fallen out of favor because the nerve can be superficial to the styloid process, and the styloid process itself can be small or absent in a proportion of cases. 3,4,9 The stylomastoid artery also has been described as a landmark to identify the facial nerve but has not become popular, probably due to the inconsistent presence and anatomical variations reported by some authors themselves. 10 Another landmark that has been described is the transverse process of axis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some authors have described the TMS as the best landmark to identify the facial nerve trunk because it is easy to find, its position is invariable, and its relation to the nerve reliable because it leads to the stylomastoid foramen. 3,5,9,11 But there are lot of objections; some authors claim that using the TMS as a landmark increases the complexity of the surgical intervention because it requires elevation of the periosteum around the ear canal and dissection inferiorly to reach it. 2,12,13 Studies by Browne and by Pather and Osman concluded that the TMS is obscured by the strong tendon of the sternocleidomastoid muscle inserted into the lateral surface of the mastoid process from its apex to its superior border.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation