2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2006.02.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exposure assessment for Bacillus cereus in ready-to-eat Kimbab selling at stores

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
(17 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…() and Bahk et al . () carried out risk assessment studies of B. cereus present in pasteurized milk and kimbab (a traditional Korean food), respectively. In their risk assessment of B. cereus in cooked rice, McElroy et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…() and Bahk et al . () carried out risk assessment studies of B. cereus present in pasteurized milk and kimbab (a traditional Korean food), respectively. In their risk assessment of B. cereus in cooked rice, McElroy et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prevalence of Salmonella in ground pork and ground chicken was modeled as a beta distribution to simulate uncertainty regarding the true positives in the survey (Bahk et al, 2007). Raw meat was assumed to be used after non-frozen storage at 4°C for up to 24 h. Based on this assumption, the model may be conservative since raw meats are often frozen before use, which could reduce the number of Salmonella.…”
Section: Prediction Of the Probability Of Salmonellosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In comparison with QMRA (quantitative microbiological risk assessment), FTA leads to a final judgment for safety management in a shorter manner than QMRA. In QMRA, the final likelihood of illnesses by dose-response assessment is estimated from the final cell numbers of pathogens by exposure assessment (Im & Lee, 2006;Im et al, 2007;Bahk et al, 2007;Doménech et al, 2007;Hoornstra et al, 2001), while FTA can solely achieve the final probability of the occurrence of the top event equivalent to the likelihood of illnesses in QMRA.…”
Section: Quantitative Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Still, however, there are shortages pertaining to the practical efficiency of these systems, so new methods have been developed to make up for the weak points. For instance, a lack of quantitative analysis on determining CCPs (critical control points) in the HACCP (hazard analysis and critical control points) system could be covered by QMRA (quantitative microbiological risk assessment) (Bahk, Todd, Hong, Oh, & Ha, 2007;Doménech, Escriche, & Martorel, 2007;Hoornstra, Northolt, Notermans, & Barendsz, 2001;Im & Lee, 2006;Im, Lee, & Lee, 2007). Recently, FTA (fault tree analysis) was introduced as a good alternative approach to HACCP implementation (Bertolini, Rizzi, & Bevilacqua, 2007;Park, Lee, & Hong, 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%