2012
DOI: 10.1038/jes.2012.45
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exposure and health risk assessment of applicators to DDT during indoor residual spraying in malaria vector control program

Abstract: We assessed exposure of applicators, health risk of DDT to the applicators and evaluated the applicability of existing pesticide exposure models for Indoor Residual Spraying (IRS). Patch sampling for dermal and personal air sampler for inhalation exposure were used in monitoring 57 applicators on the exposure assessment to DDT. The exposure of the applicators was also estimated using three exposure models. The mean actual dermal exposure was 449 mg total DDT per applicator per one house treatment. The applicat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent studies suggest elevated plasma levels of DDT and DDE among workers who apply DDT during indoor residual spraying (IRS), as well as among residents in areas where IRS takes place, compared with levels from the general population (Channa et al 2012; de Jager et al 2009; Ritter et al 2011; Wassie et al 2012). Despite evidence of potential harmful human health effects of DDT exposure, there remains a gap in knowledge regarding determinants and strategies for reduction of exposure, particularly among nonoccupationally exposed individuals (i.e., residents of IRS-treated homes).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies suggest elevated plasma levels of DDT and DDE among workers who apply DDT during indoor residual spraying (IRS), as well as among residents in areas where IRS takes place, compared with levels from the general population (Channa et al 2012; de Jager et al 2009; Ritter et al 2011; Wassie et al 2012). Despite evidence of potential harmful human health effects of DDT exposure, there remains a gap in knowledge regarding determinants and strategies for reduction of exposure, particularly among nonoccupationally exposed individuals (i.e., residents of IRS-treated homes).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors found that for shortterm exposures, the estimates were acceptable in comparison to the measurements; however, for long-term exposure the simulation tools were less accurate (Park et al 2018). Another study of the exposure to DDT from indoor residual spraying in a malaria vector control programme showed a large underestimation in the ConsExpo 5.1 b01 simulated exposure (Wassie, Spanoghe, Tessema, Steurbaut 2012). However, the specific parameters entered in the ConsExpo simulation tool was not described in detail.…”
Section: Simulations Of Exposure Concentrations In Consexpo Web and Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…농작업자의 농약 사용 시 노출의 주요 경로는 피부노출과 호흡노출이다 (Fenske and Day JR, 2005;Hughes et al, 2008;Chester, 2010;Behroozy, 2013). 피부노출 측정은 주 로 패치법(patch)을 사용해 왔으며 (Chester, 1993;Fenske, 1993;Soutar et al, 2000;Chester, 2010;Farahat et al, 2010;Wassie et al, 2012;Behroozy, 2013;Abukari, 2015;An et al, 2015;Zhao et al, 2015) 대부분의 국내 노출 연 구 또한 패치법을 주로 이용하였다 (Liu, 2003;Kang et al, 2004;Choi et al, 2006; a ; Kim et al, 2012 a,b ;Choi and Moon, 2013;Kim et al, 2013;Choi, 2014). 패치법은 사용하기 편리하고 경제적 이지만 작은 면적의 패치를 실제 체표면적으로 외삽하는 과 정에서 과대, 과소평가되는 경향이 있고, 실제 작업복과 재 질 차이로 인하여 농약의 흡착 정도가 달라 정확한 노출량 을 측정하기 어려운 단점이 있다 (Franklin et al, 1981;Fenske, 1990;Niven et al, 1993;Tannahill et al, 1996;Cao et al, 2015).…”
Section: 서 론unclassified