Export marketing in higher education: an international comparison

Abstract

Purpose How higher education institutions (HEIs) approach the recruitment of international students is an area of global interest (James-MacEachern, 2018, Ross et al., 2013), but there is limited focus on how institutions in different parts of the world approach international student recruitment as an export marketing orientation (EMO). The purpose of this paper is to examine the similarities and differences of export marketing orientation amongst three higher education institutions. Design/methodology/approach This study uses export marketing concepts to compare three universities from Canada, Hong Kong and the UK to explore how institutions use international student recruitment as export marketing in international markets. Findings The study finds a number of similarities and differences in how HEIs react and respond to market and global environments, and responses impact the level of EMO. It argues that institutions rely differently on export marketing in their approach international students and highlights the need to understand how various factors such as national policy and institutional strategy impacts institutional adoption of an EMO in higher education. Originality/value By comparing HEIs from different parts of the world, this paper shows differences in export marketing orientation that are shaped by national policy frameworks and organizational culture. This is the first time three institutions from Canada, Hong Kong and the UK have been compared for EMO, and this study provides new insights into the factors that contribute or hinder EMO for HEIs.

Thailand, the forgotten market for international student recruitment? A qualitative study into the strategies of regional Australian universities

“…Recent data shows 86% of potential students in Thailand seek agents’ services to make decisions about pursuing their studies in Australia (Austrade, 2023). Consequently, agent relationships are paramount for successful recruitment (Yang and Akhtaruzzaman, 2017; Srikatanyoo and Gnoth, 2005; James and Derrick, 2021). However, previous studies often failed to differentiate between large metropolitan universities and regional institutions, which led to a tendency to generalise insights across all Australian universities, treating them as a homogeneous group in terms of their recruitment strategies.…”

Sustainable Digital Communication in Higher Education—A Checklist for Page Loading Speed Optimisation

“…Thus, their decision is a multi-criteria one. Several studies have explored the strategic marketing responses of universities in order to face the increasing competition for student enrolment [19][20][21][22], and some of these have specifically implied the page loading speeds of universities' online pages [23,24].…”

Marketing of an academic program: case study of an engineering program

“…More extensive studies on the marketing of educational services and the market of educational services in various countries (including Poland, the Russian Federation, Serbia, Spain, Great Britain, Canada, Hong Kong, Italy, the Czech Republic), taken from different perspectives, can be found in publications Brkanlic et al (2020), Nureev et al (2020), Smørvik and Vespestad (2020). Knight (2019), Fajčíkova and Urbancova (2019), Fantauzzi et al (2019), James and Derrick (2019), Guilbault (2018). Bolat and O'Sullivan, (2017), Ivy (2008), Hayes (2007).…”