1983
DOI: 10.1364/ao.22.000095
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explosion dust particle size measurements

Abstract: In situ measurements of the sizes and concentrations of dust particles generated by the detonation of high explosives in clay soil near Leesville, La., sandy clay soil near Huntsville, Ala., and sandy soils near Orogrande, N.M. are reported. Measurements were generally made within 1 m of the surface (in one case 10 m) at distances ranging from 10 to approximately 50 m from the detonation point with a combination of Knollenberg lightscattering counters (for particles with equivalent radius in the submicron to 1… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To quantify the suspended dust loading, the transmissibility of the obscurant media was measured via the attenuation of the signal from 1-mW red laser pointers placed at various distances (≈6, 17, 25 m) along the test chamber. A similar method was used successfully in the past by Pinnick, Fernandez, and Hinds (1983), which compared the transmission of visible and infrared signals at specific frequencies through explosion-generated dust, as well as using a plethora of independent measurement techniques (Hi-Vol sampling and subsequent lab analysis, Knollenburg counters of various sensitivities and measurement principles) to characterize the dust.…”
Section: Measuring Obscurant Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To quantify the suspended dust loading, the transmissibility of the obscurant media was measured via the attenuation of the signal from 1-mW red laser pointers placed at various distances (≈6, 17, 25 m) along the test chamber. A similar method was used successfully in the past by Pinnick, Fernandez, and Hinds (1983), which compared the transmission of visible and infrared signals at specific frequencies through explosion-generated dust, as well as using a plethora of independent measurement techniques (Hi-Vol sampling and subsequent lab analysis, Knollenburg counters of various sensitivities and measurement principles) to characterize the dust.…”
Section: Measuring Obscurant Densitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An interesting characteristic of almost all measured dust clouds is that the distribution of particle sizes is bimodal, as illustrated in Figure 4. This is apparently independent of the source of the dust, as it has been measured for wind blown dust (Patterson 1977;Pinnick, Fernandez et al 1985), vehicle generated dust and dust generated by explosions (Pinnick, Fernandez et al 1983). Unexpectedly, the distribution holds irrespective of the density of the dust cloud, though the proportions may change.…”
Section: Attenuation Through Clouds Of Dust and Water Dropletsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…This was in general found to produce a particle size spectrum with much of the contaminant mass in the 30-100 µm range, and a smaller peak in the range of a few microns. This type of size distribution was also measured in US blast experiments impacting on soil (Pinnick et al, 1983), and after the Thule accident in 1968. The Thule explosion was essentially similar to that of a 'dirty bomb': a conventional explosion dispersing a solid, quite possibly ceramic, radioactive material with a very high melting point.…”
Section: Scenario Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 65%