2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Explosion characteristics of pulverised torrefied and raw Norway spruce (Picea abies) and Southern pine (Pinus palustris) in comparison to bituminous coal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Year Application [206] 2016 -Processing and sorting forest residues: Cost, productivity and managerial impacts [207] 2016 -Fast hydrothermal liquefaction for production of chemicals and biofuels from wet biomass-The need to develop a plug-flow reactor [208] 2016 -Technical improvements and economic-environmental assessment along the overall torrefaction supply chain through the SECTOR project [209] 2016 -an assessment of the torrefaction of north american pine and life cycle greenhouse gase emission [210] 2016 -Optimal production scheduling for energy efficiency improvement in biofuel feedstock preprocessing considering work-in-process particle separation [211] 2016 -optimization the minimum production cost for the production of woody biofuels [212] 2016 -Prediction of high-temperature rapid combustion behaviour of woody biomass particles [213] 2016 -Environmental and Energy Performance of the Biomass to Synthetic Natural Gas Supply Chain [214] 2016 -Modeling of biofuel pellets torrefaction in a realistic geometry [215] 2015 -regionalized techno-economic assessment and policy analysis for biomass molded fuel in China [216] 2015 -Investigation into the applicability of Bond Work Index (BWI) and Hardgrove Grindability Index (HGI) tests for several biomasses compared to Colombian La Loma coal [217] 2015 -Explosion characteristics of pulverised torrefied and raw Norway spruce (Picea abies) and Southern pine (Pinus palustris) in comparison to bituminous coal [218] 2015 -high moisture corn stover pelleting in a flat die pellet mill fitted-physical properties and specific energy consumption [219] 2015 -comparative cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of wood pellet production with torrefaction [220] 2011 -to achieve a first understanding of the possibility to combine torrefaction and hydrolysis for lignocellulosic bioethanol processes, and to evaluate it in terms of sugar and ethanol yields…”
Section: Refmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Year Application [206] 2016 -Processing and sorting forest residues: Cost, productivity and managerial impacts [207] 2016 -Fast hydrothermal liquefaction for production of chemicals and biofuels from wet biomass-The need to develop a plug-flow reactor [208] 2016 -Technical improvements and economic-environmental assessment along the overall torrefaction supply chain through the SECTOR project [209] 2016 -an assessment of the torrefaction of north american pine and life cycle greenhouse gase emission [210] 2016 -Optimal production scheduling for energy efficiency improvement in biofuel feedstock preprocessing considering work-in-process particle separation [211] 2016 -optimization the minimum production cost for the production of woody biofuels [212] 2016 -Prediction of high-temperature rapid combustion behaviour of woody biomass particles [213] 2016 -Environmental and Energy Performance of the Biomass to Synthetic Natural Gas Supply Chain [214] 2016 -Modeling of biofuel pellets torrefaction in a realistic geometry [215] 2015 -regionalized techno-economic assessment and policy analysis for biomass molded fuel in China [216] 2015 -Investigation into the applicability of Bond Work Index (BWI) and Hardgrove Grindability Index (HGI) tests for several biomasses compared to Colombian La Loma coal [217] 2015 -Explosion characteristics of pulverised torrefied and raw Norway spruce (Picea abies) and Southern pine (Pinus palustris) in comparison to bituminous coal [218] 2015 -high moisture corn stover pelleting in a flat die pellet mill fitted-physical properties and specific energy consumption [219] 2015 -comparative cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of wood pellet production with torrefaction [220] 2011 -to achieve a first understanding of the possibility to combine torrefaction and hydrolysis for lignocellulosic bioethanol processes, and to evaluate it in terms of sugar and ethanol yields…”
Section: Refmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The volume of the explosion chamber was 20 L. The device is routinely used for standard explosion measurements . The results obtained in the 20 L explosion test apparatus show good agreements with those obtained using other, standardized apparatuses …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Torrefied wood dust was studied by Wilén et al, who classified it as St1 and concluded that the reactivity and explosion risk of torrefied biomass increased compared to raw biomass. Medina et al studied pulverized torrefied Norwegian spruce and Southern pine and measured the explosion properties of both the torrefied and raw biomass. , They found that the explosion characteristic of torrefied spruce was 20% higher than that of the raw biomass and that the explosivity of both torrefied spruce and pine was higher than that of bituminous coal . The effect of torrefaction on explosion properties was mostly explained by an increased fraction of fine particles in the torrefied samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To date, the reports about wood dust explosion characteristics are still in a fragmentary stage, including the description of the individual explosion characteristics of wood dust, describing common physical laws of various dust types such as explosion incentives, explosive conditions, as well as explosion and explosion factors (Hedlund et al 2014;Krentowski 2015). Minimal attention has been paid to the combustion and explosion dynamics in wood explosions (Calle et al 2005;Huescar Medina et al 2015), mainly because of the considerable variation in wood particle size and morphology, as well as the low density and large specific surface area of wood dust.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%