Exploring why Costa Rica outperforms the United States in life expectancy: A tale of two inequality gradients

Abstract

Mortality in the United States is 18% higher than in Costa Rica among adult men and 10% higher among middle-aged women, despite the several times higher income and health expenditures of the United States. This comparison simultaneously shows the potential for substantially lowering mortality in other middleincome countries and highlights the United States' poor health performance. The United States' underperformance is strongly linked to its much steeper socioeconomic (SES) gradients in health. Although the highest SES quartile in the United States has better mortality than the highest quartile in Costa Rica, US mortality in its lowest quartile is markedly worse than in Costa Rica's lowest quartile, providing powerful evidence that the US health inequality patterns are not inevitable. High SES-mortality gradients in the United States are apparent in all broad cause-of-death groups, but Costa Rica's overall mortality advantage can be explained largely by two causes of death: lung cancer and heart disease. Lung cancer mortality in the United States is four times higher among men and six times higher among women compared with Costa Rica. Mortality by heart disease is 54% and 12% higher in the United States than in Costa Rica for men and women, respectively. SES gradients for heart disease and diabetes mortality are also much steeper in the United States. These patterns may be partly explained by much steeper SES gradients in the United States compared with Costa Rica for behavioral and medical risk factors such as smoking, obesity, lack of health insurance, and uncontrolled dysglycemia and hypertension.adult mortality | socioeconomic status | inequality |

Is tooth loss important when evaluating perceived general health? Findings from a nationally representative study of Costa Rican adults

“…Costa Rica has a higher life expectancy compared to the United States of America, even though its per capita income and health investments are smaller. Differences between healthcare systems and economic inequality could explain the variations observed . Studying the relative impact of oral health on general health in Costa Rican adults adds to the literature based on a different cultural and economic context.…”

Redistributive effects of different pension systems when longevity varies by socioeconomic status

“…There are large differences in mortality by socioeconomic status in rich industrial nations and in some developing countries as well, according to a growing literature which has also found that these differences have often widened in recent decades (NASEM, 2015;OECD, 2016;Waldron, 2007;Bosworth et al, 2016;Chetty et al, 2016;Rosero-Bixby and Dow, 2016;Rostron et al, 2010). While these increasing inequalities in health are themselves an urgent and critically important problem for policy, here we will focus on a different issue: These mortality differences interact with government programs, particularly those for the elderly such as public pensions, health care, and long term care.…”

Measuring Socioeconomic Position From The Social Inequalities In Health Perspective?: The Case of Costa Rica

“…En Costa Rica, fue utilizado en varios estudios, con tres (11) o cuatro modalidades (ninguna, terminó primaria, fue a la secundaria, fue a la universidad) (10,14), o con el número de años de educación (15,16).…”

“…El ingreso se presenta como una variable cuantitativa continua (CRELES), pero se debe utilizar el rango (16), una log-transformación, o como una variable cualitativa dividida en diferentes categorías. Las categorías se pueden definir a partir de los datos o de la división por quintil a nivel nacional o la región de planificación.…”

“…Modrek dividió la población en dos categorías (asegurado/no-asegurado) (10) y Brenes en tres (15), separando los seguros nocontributivos de los seguros contributivos. Sin embargo, el hecho de no estar asegurado puede reflejar una situación económica difícil o por el contrario, una situación económica favorecida, que permite utilizar servicios de salud privados (16).…”