Exploring the Role of Enforcement in Promoting Adherence with Protective Behaviours during COVID-19

Abstract

The aim of this narrative review was to explore the conditions under which enforcement likely is, or is not, an effective strategy to increase adherence to recommended protective behaviours during COVID-19. Relevant search terms were entered into four key databases (Google, Google Scholar, medXriv, and psyArXiv) to identify both academic and non-academic papers relating to the use of enforcement. Primary research, reviews, blogs, newspaper reports, and theoretical descriptions were included. This review suggests that enforcement is less effective when: it is applied inconsistently; rules are ambiguous; and behaviours are unobservable. Providing food and financial support, creating social norms, and increasing trust are more effective in addressing specific barriers and fostering voluntary adherence. Where enforcement forms part of the strategy for policing COVID-19 regulations, rules must be clear and local responders must be given time and opportunity to plan their response as new rules are implemented. Due to the narrative nature of the review, and the rapidly changing nature of the COVID-19 pandemic, some evidence may have been inadvertently excluded. Findings inform an understanding of the impact of the public narrative of enforcement on adherence and facilitate the development of recommendations for increasing adherence to protective behaviours during COVID-19. Given the importance of public adherence, these recommendations are not only useful in the context of COVID-19 but also for future public health emergencies. This narrative review is the first to explore the circumstances under which enforcement can increase or reduce adherence with COVID-19 guidelines, generating recommendations for improved public adherence.

Interventions to promote physical distancing behaviour during infectious disease pandemics or epidemics: A systematic review

“…The review also identified BCTs that were ineffective. There was no support for using the BCT of future punishment (10.11) as government fines ( Hoeben et al, 2021 ) were ineffective; this is supported by recent reviews suggesting that punitive approaches to public health are often ineffective or counterproductive ( Independent SAGE, 2021 ; Mills et al, 2021 ).…”

A Review of COVID-19 Deaths among Law Enforcement Officers in the United States

“…Another change in crime reporting concerned calls for LEOs to respond to violations of COVID-19 policies for protective and preventive behaviors (e.g., stay at home orders; face mask requirement; public gathering restrictions; Mills et al, 2021; White and Fradella, 2020). Responding to these calls may have increased an officer’s risk of COVID-19 exposure, as some responding officers were coughed or spit on by civilians.…”

Lockdowns and Mobility Rate Variation in the COVID-19 Era

“…In addition, the importance of contextual factors in shaping citizens' rule compliance (lower mobility rates) is considered, such as the level of stringency of containment measures (Caselli et al, 2022), modalities of public enforcement (Mills et al, 2021), government trust (Bargain & Aminjonov, 2020), risk perception (Xie et al, 2020) and the influence of time (Six et al, 2021).…”