Exploring the Relationship Between Mobile Facebook and Social Capital: What Is the “Mobile Difference” for Parents of Young Children?
Andrew R. Schrock
Abstract:Mobile media have generally been found to reinforce close ties. Many have predicted this will bring about an onerous social insularity or “network privatism.” However, mobile media now enable frequent communication and multimedia activities with larger, more diffuse social networks. Might we be at a tipping point where certain groups benefit from weak tie connections on mobile social media? To answer this question, this study considers how mobile media altered social capital outcomes on Facebook among parents … Show more
“…In line with other recent efforts (e.g. Humphreys et al, 2013;Schrock, 2016), this study advances the need for considering context in conjunction with user practices. We have demonstrated how Facebook activities are associated with differential outcomes according to temporal scale and spatial location.…”
Section: The Role Of Context In Future Theory and Researchsupporting
This article advances a contextual approach to understanding the emotional and social outcomes of Facebook use. In doing so, we address the ambiguity of previously reported relationships between Facebook use and well-being. We test temporal (shorter vs longer time spans) and spatial (at home vs away from home) dimensions of Facebook activity using an innovative approach. By triggering smartphone surveys in response to users’ naturalistic Facebook posting, we captured the immediate context of both mobile and desktop activities during daily life. Findings indicated positive—yet fleeting—emotional experiences up to 10 minutes after active posting and higher arousal for 30 minutes following posting at home. Nonetheless, Facebook activities predicted no changes in aggregate mood over 2 weeks, despite showing positive relationships to bridging social capital during the same period. Our results call attention to fleeting experiences (vs enduring consequences) and encourage future research to specify temporal and spatial boundaries.
“…In line with other recent efforts (e.g. Humphreys et al, 2013;Schrock, 2016), this study advances the need for considering context in conjunction with user practices. We have demonstrated how Facebook activities are associated with differential outcomes according to temporal scale and spatial location.…”
Section: The Role Of Context In Future Theory and Researchsupporting
This article advances a contextual approach to understanding the emotional and social outcomes of Facebook use. In doing so, we address the ambiguity of previously reported relationships between Facebook use and well-being. We test temporal (shorter vs longer time spans) and spatial (at home vs away from home) dimensions of Facebook activity using an innovative approach. By triggering smartphone surveys in response to users’ naturalistic Facebook posting, we captured the immediate context of both mobile and desktop activities during daily life. Findings indicated positive—yet fleeting—emotional experiences up to 10 minutes after active posting and higher arousal for 30 minutes following posting at home. Nonetheless, Facebook activities predicted no changes in aggregate mood over 2 weeks, despite showing positive relationships to bridging social capital during the same period. Our results call attention to fleeting experiences (vs enduring consequences) and encourage future research to specify temporal and spatial boundaries.
“…El estudio de las redes sociales se ha abordado en los últimos años desde diferentes perspectivas: desde la participación activa de los jóvenes (García-Galera, del-Hoyo-Hurtado y Fernández-Muñoz, 2014), desde perspectivas afectivo-familiares y de relaciones (Takeuchi, 2011;Padilla, Rodríguez, Álvarez, Torres, Suárez y Rodrigo, 2015;Schrock, 2016; Vidales y Sábada, 2017), desde las experiencias negativas y percepción de riesgo (De-Fru-tos y Marcos, 2017; Peddinti, Ross y Cappos, 2014; Radesky, Schumacher y Zuckerman, 2015), desde la relación entre jóvenes y tecnología (Lenhart, Smith, Anderson, Duggan y Perrin, 2015), sin embargo, se echan en falta enfoques más pedagógicos que aborden el estudio de las redes sociales como espacios comunicativos y de desarrollo competencial. Es en este punto donde el artículo que aquí se presenta pretende abrir un nuevo campo de investigación, aportando este estudio de caso.…”
La altísima penetración de los smartphones entre la población infantil y adolescente ha propiciado el acceso masivo de este público a las redes sociales, que se han convertido en importantes ámbitos de socialización. Utilizadas como mecanismos de participación, integración e interacción social, niños y adolescentes se han integrado en las redes como escenarios naturales de desarrollo. El objetivo de este trabajo es ofrecer un enfoque pedagógico al estudio de las redes como espacios comunicativos y de desarrollo competencial a través de un estudio de caso de la red Musical.ly. La elección de esta red se justifica por el hecho de que la mayoría de sus 200 millones de usuarios son jóvenes entre 11 y 16 años. La metodología empleada ha sido de corte cualitativo de análisis de contenido basándose en las teorías de la comunicación mediada. A partir del estudio de la estructura mediática de la red, así como de las acciones que posibilita, este trabajo aporta evidencias de la relación que existe entre las acciones que se realizan al utilizar la red social con el desarrollo competencial de la alfabetización mediática y digital, abriendo un relevante campo de investigación que propone las redes sociales como herramientas de aprendizaje.
“…Instead, they have the potential to build bonds and bridges (Wilken, 2011) that potentially strengthen social connections in both virtual (Kobayashi et al, 2015) and face-to-face (Chayko, 2021) contexts. Such connections include parent-child bonds when smartphones offer opportunities for co-use and other forms of digital and physical interaction (Schrock, 2016). Smartphones may also enhance people's interactions with physical spaces through, for example, visual, informational, and gamified digital contents that map onto various geolocations (Hjorth & Pink, 2014).…”
Though prior research has examined how parents use mobile devices in public, we know less about children’s use of mobile devices outside the home. The present study therefore explores how children use mobile devices in public places they visit with their parents in order to conceptualize how device use affects children’s interactions with their parents and environments. We used naturalistic non-participant observational methods in three locations in the US: eateries, laundromats, and airports. We observed 77 families with at least one parent and one child estimated to be between 2-6 years old. The observers wrote detailed field notes that we analyzed qualitatively using thematic analysis. We found that children used mobile devices in 31% of the observed families. We categorized children’s behaviors under three themes: immersion, distraction, and co-use. Children were highly engaged with their parents and environment during co-use. However, when children asked for a device or were provided with a device that they used on their own, they were less engaged with parents and environments. Engagement levels between children and parents therefore corresponded with the circumstances of children’s device use and whether they used devices with their parents or in isolation from them. The themes we develop here may be applied to future qualitative and quantitative studies of children’s mobile device use in public and at home.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.