2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-021-06037-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the needs and experiences of palliative home care from the perspectives of patients with advanced cancer in China: a qualitative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All studies were conducted in mainland China: five in Shanghai, 8 18–21 two in Tianjin, 22 23 two in Jiangsu, 24 25 two in Guangdong 26 27 and one each in Xinjiang, 28 Hebei, 29 Beijing 30 and Hunan. 31 Wang et al 32 Wang et al 33 and Liu et al 34 did not specify the study setting in their reports. Eight studies explored the needs of family caregivers of dying patients, while six focused on dying patients and four on both patients and their family members.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…All studies were conducted in mainland China: five in Shanghai, 8 18–21 two in Tianjin, 22 23 two in Jiangsu, 24 25 two in Guangdong 26 27 and one each in Xinjiang, 28 Hebei, 29 Beijing 30 and Hunan. 31 Wang et al 32 Wang et al 33 and Liu et al 34 did not specify the study setting in their reports. Eight studies explored the needs of family caregivers of dying patients, while six focused on dying patients and four on both patients and their family members.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, none of the studies included statements regarding the cultural or theoretical perspectives of the researchers or addressed the influences of researchers' perspectives on the study results. Additionally, evidence of ethical approval by the respective body was not presented by any study, except the study by Liu et al 34 The methodological quality varied between the nine quantitative studies. The inclusion criteria were clearly stated by all studies, except the study by Liu et al 29 The study subjects and setting were described in all studies, except in the study by Zhao et al 30 Two studies 21 29 did not measure the exposure using valid and reliable methods.…”
Section: Quality Of Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations