1996
DOI: 10.2307/2096455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the Limits of the New Institutionalism: The Causes and Consequences of Illegitimate Organizational Change

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
305
0
15

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 580 publications
(326 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
5
305
0
15
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the findings of this study suggest that early adopters are no more motivated to achieve economic gains than later ones; or, to put it the other way around, later adopters are no less motivated to achieve economic gains than are early ones. Rather than supporting the two-stage model, our results are consistent with other studies that have not shown differences between early and later adoption periods (e.g., Kraatz & Zajac, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In fact, the findings of this study suggest that early adopters are no more motivated to achieve economic gains than later ones; or, to put it the other way around, later adopters are no less motivated to achieve economic gains than are early ones. Rather than supporting the two-stage model, our results are consistent with other studies that have not shown differences between early and later adoption periods (e.g., Kraatz & Zajac, 1996).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…For instance, in a study of the diffusion of human resource practices among law firms, Sherer and Lee (2002) failed to find support for the notion that competitive-technical pressures explained early, but not later, adoption. Similarly, Kraatz and Zajac (1996) found no link between technical variables and early versus late adoption of professional degree programs in American liberal arts colleges. Similarly, prior research found mixed support for the two-stage model in studies of the diffusion of both matrix management (Burns & Wholey, 1993) and work-family programs (Goodstein, 1994;Ingram & Simons, 1995).…”
Section: Rethinking Adoption Motivationsmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Power relates to stakeholders' control of resources which confers upon them what Suchman (1995) terms 'pragmatic legitimacy' and may allow them to force through the adoption of a given practice; DiMaggio and Powell (1983) term this 'coercive isomorphism'. The extent to which legitimation is the driving force of adoption relative to instrumental considerations is unclear (Kraatz & Moore, 2002;Kraatz & Zajac, 1996;Rivera & de Leon, 2004) suggest that the threat of resource sanctions is a necessary driver of institutionalization, and that considerations of legitimacy alone are insufficient to influence practice adoption.…”
Section: Institutional Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organizations tend to model themselves on similar organizations in their field that they perceive to be legitimate or successful [6], by imitating and acquiring the attributes, innovations, and practices that have been proven to be attributable to the success of SCM.…”
Section: Mimesismentioning
confidence: 99%