2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.im.2013.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the interaction effects of social capital

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 92 publications
1
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The social trust represents the relational capital of individuals and it greatly enhances the willingness of individuals to share knowledge (Mu, Peng, & Love, ). If a team pays more attention to the accumulation of trust capital, the costs of communicating, coordinating, and combining each other's knowledge will decrease (Hsu & Hung, ). The cognitive dimension refers to resources that reside in shared vision and collective meanings among individuals to facilitate development of common sense making.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The social trust represents the relational capital of individuals and it greatly enhances the willingness of individuals to share knowledge (Mu, Peng, & Love, ). If a team pays more attention to the accumulation of trust capital, the costs of communicating, coordinating, and combining each other's knowledge will decrease (Hsu & Hung, ). The cognitive dimension refers to resources that reside in shared vision and collective meanings among individuals to facilitate development of common sense making.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the business performance variable, the reviewed literature supports the relationship between social capital and different organizational outputs (e.g., Andrews 2010; Hsu and Hung 2013; Wang and Chen 2016, Bellavitis et al 2017). For instance, Hsu and Hung (2013), in an information system development context, conclude that each social capital dimension -structural, relational and cognitive-, and their peer interaction, have a positive impact on both performance and systems development processes. Similarly, Wang and Chen (2016) show different influences that diverse network structures have on the business performance of start-ups, measured through their annual sales.…”
Section: Results From the Strategic Management Of Social Capitalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the dimensions suggested by these authors -structural, relational and cognitive-seems to summarise all the aspects that underpin social capital as a valuable resource to firms because it is capable of providing rents, both Ricardian (those that are gained because of the possession or control of unique resources), and specifically relational (Nahapiet and Ghoshal 1998). Consequently, this is the most commonly used dimensional differentiation in social capital literature (Zheng 2010;Hsu and Hung 2013) for the purposes of examining its impact on issues such as organizational results (Leana and Pil 2006;Andrews 2010;Hsu and Hung 2013), knowledge acquisition and transfer (Presutti et al 2007;Preston et al 2017) or innovation (Tsai and Ghoshal 1998;Zheng 2010;Delgado et al 2011).…”
Section: Social Capital: Concept and Dimensionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As described previously, relational capital is the mechanism, which is embedded in individuals and utilized by interactions among the individuals and their networks of relationships [16]. In recent years, the importance of interaction effect of social capital on performance has been highlighted [1] [27]. In the explorative innovation activities, development of new IT-related applications often requires cross-functional collaboration [29][32].…”
Section: Effect Of Relational Capital This Study Definesmentioning
confidence: 99%