Exploring the influence of context on food safety management: Case studies of leafy greens production in Europe

Kirezieva, Klementina; Jacxsens, Liesbeth; Hagelaar, Geoffrey; Boekel, M.A.J.S. van; Uyttendaele, Mieke; Luning, Pieternel A.

doi:10.1016/j.foodpol.2015.01.005

Cited by 37 publications

(40 citation statements)

References 68 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This ECQ approach operates at three levels: the individual (microlevel); the local (mesolevel), and the wider environment in which the business operates (macrolevel). The use of this triple locus of analysis (macro–meso–micro) can be seen in a number of studies that focus on organizational culture in the food supply chain (Kirezieva et al., 2013; Kirezieva et al., 2015; Luning et al., 2011; Manning et al., 2019; Nayak & Waterson, 2016). This means that multiple climate characteristics can exist and can be exhibited within the same organization at the same time and at different loci of analysis.…”

Section: Compliance‐based and Integrity‐based Management Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Moving from a compliance‐based to an integrity‐based organizational climate in the food supply chain

Manning¹

2020

Comp Rev Food Sci Food Safe

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Compliance is the act or status of complying with an imperative regulatory or normative requirement, that is, compliance means working within boundaries defined by contractual, social, or cultural standards. The aim of this narrative review is to use the food supply chain as a lens of enquiry to distinguish between compliance-based and integrity-based organizational climates and frame and rationalize why deviant behavior arises and how it can be identified. Contemporary theory is explored and critiqued using case studies to contextualize the challenge of organizations promoting supply chain compliance and at the same time recognizing the need for deviant behavior to occur in order to drive innovation and continuous improvement within food supply chains. Deviant behavior can be perceived as either positive in terms of driving continuous improvement or destructive where this behavior has a negative impact on the organization. Although multiple cultural maturity models seek to characterize positive food safety culture and climate, there is minimal research that focuses on the characterization of deviant negative behavior or the development of early warning systems designed to pinpoint signals, traits, or characteristics of this behavior such as low staff morale, theft, property destruction, or absenteeism. The use of cultural maturity models and assessment tools is of value in assisting organizations to translate from a rule, instrumental, or compliance-based organizational climate to an ethically strong organizational climate that focuses on integrity, building trust, and values and a new cultural maturity model is proposed and explored.

show abstract

Section: Compliance‐based and Integrity‐based Management Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Moving from a compliance‐based to an integrity‐based organizational climate in the food supply chain

Manning¹

2020

Comp Rev Food Sci Food Safe

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…It is important to recognize that FSMS are not operating in isolation, instead they are an element within wider organizational and supply chain sociotechnical systems, and the influence of internal and external triggers means that they operate in a situational business/environment context that can set boundaries on the design, application, and implementation of the FSMS, that is, the sociotechnical system can be multilevel. Further, effective FSMS require the embedding of systems thinking and a clear acknowledgement and understanding of the complexity of the sociotechnical systems that provide the context in which they operate (Kirezieva et al., , ). Nayak and Waterson () analyzed the causes of two foodborne outbreaks rooted in six system levels, which together shape the sociotechnical system in which an organization and its FSMS operate: Government level : Where regulation is developed to control food safety. Regulatory bodies and association level : Where regulation is translated into industry rules and standards designed to address food safety. Organizational level : Where the industry rules and regulation are integrated into the organizational and situational rules and policies. Management level : Where the staff activities and roles are specified and overseen with reference to the organizational level rules and policies. Staff level : Where the staff or work force are required to follow the rules set by their managers, and Equipment and surroundings level : Where the organization's situational rules and policies are applied to ensure compliance with government regulations, industry rules and standards, and organizational rules and policies. …”

Section: Holistic Approaches To Food Safety and Developing Fsmsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…External context factors that exert influence from the broader context include supply chain, socio-political, legal, and national factors (Kirezieva et al, 2015b). These are also called macro factors by Nayak and Waterson (2016).…”

Section: Holistic Approaches To Food Safety and Developing Fsms Risk mentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The impact of the combination of individual or concerted internal and/or external triggers is to create organizational and wider supply chain uncertainty. It can be postulated that internal trigger factors include changes such as new production systems, technology, and new Table 3-Characterization of context factors that frame the FSMS (Adapted from Kirezieva et al, 2013Kirezieva et al, , 2015bLuning et al, 2011a). Intrinsic properties of raw materials, in-process material and finished products.…”

Section: Holistic Approaches To Food Safety and Developing Fsms Risk mentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Sociotechnical Systemsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

The Evolution and Cultural Framing of Food Safety Management Systems—Where From and Where Next?

Manning

Luning

Wallace

2019

Comp Rev Food Sci Food Safe

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this paper is to review the development of food safety management systems (FSMS) from their origins in the 1950s to the present. The food safety challenges in modern food supply systems are explored and it is argued that there is a need for a more holistic thinking approach to food safety management. The narrative review highlights that while the transactional elements of how FSMS are developed, validated, implemented, monitored, and verified remains largely unchanged, how organizational culture frames the operation and efficacy of FSMS is becoming more important. The evolution of a wider academic and industry understanding of both the influence of food safety culture (FS‐culture) and also how such culture frames and enables, or conversely restricts the efficacy of the FSMS is crucial for consumer well‐being. Potential research gaps worthy of further study are identified as well as recommendations given for the application of the research findings within the food industry.

show abstract

A bibliometric analysis of food safety governance research from 1999 to 2019

Shen

Ming-xia

Sheng

2021

Food Science & Nutrition

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Although the number of food governance‐related studies increased rapidly in the recent decade, the current academic research still lacked systematic integration of food safety governance. To clarify the development trends of research therein, this study summarized research articles concerning food safety governance by the Web of Science Core Collection. An in‐depth bibliometric analysis was then conducted through CiteSpace to summarize the current characters and hot spots of food safety governance research, and predicted future research trends. Results showed that food safety governance was multidisciplinary, which included environmental science, food science, economics, and agriculture. The United States had the largest number of relevant articles, and Wageningen University was the most influential scientific research institution. Among all the journals in this field, Food Policy ranked the first in publication volume and co‐citation frequency. The development of food safety governance research was divided into three processes, namely the separate formulation of the standards for public and private sectors, the joint implementation of these standards, and co‐governance by multiple sectors. The most popular research hot spots in this field were food safety policy integration and public–private partnership of food safety governance. Lower‐ and middle‐income countries focused more on food supply and food system design, and regrettably not on food safety. Higher‐income countries cared more about food safety and food nutrition. Besides, researchers of higher‐income countries also concentrated on consumers' voices in participating in food safety governance. Food safety co‐governance, online food governance, the willingness to buy safe food, and food safety governance under pandemics were considered as future research directions.

show abstract

Exploring the influence of context on food safety management: Case studies of leafy greens production in Europe

Cited by 37 publications

References 68 publications

Moving from a compliance‐based to an integrity‐based organizational climate in the food supply chain

Moving from a compliance‐based to an integrity‐based organizational climate in the food supply chain

The Evolution and Cultural Framing of Food Safety Management Systems—Where From and Where Next?

A bibliometric analysis of food safety governance research from 1999 to 2019

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About