2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-016-1328-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the individual patterns of spiritual well-being in people newly diagnosed with advanced cancer: a cluster analysis

Abstract: This study provides empirical support for individual difference in response to a newly diagnosed cancer and brings into focus conceptual and methodological challenges associated with the measure of spiritual well-being, which may partly contribute to the attenuated relation between faith and QOL.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…1) newly diagnosed cancer patients [3,24,33,34]; 2) cancer survivors [35][36][37][38]; 3) terminal cancer patients [39][40][41][42].…”
Section: Reference Intervalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1) newly diagnosed cancer patients [3,24,33,34]; 2) cancer survivors [35][36][37][38]; 3) terminal cancer patients [39][40][41][42].…”
Section: Reference Intervalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Abbreviations ECOG: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; FACIT-Sp: Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual; POS: Palliative Care Outcome Scale; QOL: Quality of Life [24,33] only, as [3] calculated such scores using different items and [34] didn't provide this information. Conversely, all papers related to this group were used to calculate means and limits of Spiritual Well Being as the total score includes all the items.…”
Section: Supplementary Informationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When unmet, spiritual needs can have a profound impact on symptoms, social relationships, quality of life, and well-being. [2021222324252627282930] In addition, spiritual concerns can influence decision-making about treatments[3132] as well as coping and adjustment to illness. [333435]…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 16 of the studies included in the review, the measure of religiosity/spirituality assessed was spiritual well-being. In 13 of these studies, spiritual well-being was understood as consisting of the three dimensions used by the FACIT-Sp12: meaning, peace, and faith [ 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 ]. In two other studies, spiritual well-being was understood as consisting of other dimensions, specifically those that comprise the EORTC QLQ-SWB32: existential, relationship with self, relationship with others, and relationship with someone/something greater [ 60 , 61 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%