2021
DOI: 10.3390/app11198794
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the Gaze Behavior of Tennis Players with Different Skill Levels When Receiving Serves through Eye Movement Information

Abstract: Background: The purpose of this study was to explore the gaze behavior of tennis players with different skill levels when receiving serves through eye movement information. Methods: The skill level was divided into group A (experts, with more than 10 years of playing experience) and group B (novices, with less than 2 years of playing experience). We compared the differences in gaze behavior between groups A and B at the head-shoulder, trunk-hips, arm-hand, leg-foot, racket, ball, and racket-ball contact area s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The viewing position is 4 m from the projection screen. Sitting in the center of the projection screen, the first practice receives three balls and then officially begins to receive ten balls, i.e., five random shot balls in front and back [43]. The player hits as many as 75 balls in practice to become accustomed to hitting the ball [44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The viewing position is 4 m from the projection screen. Sitting in the center of the projection screen, the first practice receives three balls and then officially begins to receive ten balls, i.e., five random shot balls in front and back [43]. The player hits as many as 75 balls in practice to become accustomed to hitting the ball [44].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 6 illustrates the player's move from P i to P j , along with the corresponding change of D i to D j , thus the V i to V j . In this study, a total of 500 MVS around two tennis courts were set up in glare simulations, at a vertical eye height of 1.5 m. 48,49 The angle of rotatable VDs was dependent on the specific VP and the object points, O 1 and O 2 (i.e. boundary point of the court domain), and the distance of shiftable VPs was set to 2.75 m. Those MVS were derived from the shot charts of a professional tennis player that were played over a period of 6 months (see Figure 5), which is a significant amount of tennis player-tracking data.…”
Section: Design Of Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple sport perceptual–cognitive studies in tennis [ 16 , 19 , 20 , 21 ], badminton [ 22 , 23 ], squash [ 2 ], soccer [ 3 , 24 , 25 ], handball [ 26 ], and basketball [ 8 ] have demonstrated that expert athletes possess superior visual cognitive abilities, enabling them to effectively process early information and exhibit greater accuracy in anticipation and decision making compared to novices [ 5 , 7 , 27 ]. To explore the mechanism behind expert athletes’ exceptional anticipation performance, several studies have employed eye-tracking devices to focus on visual information utilization and processing [ 13 , 28 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, as the action of serving in tennis is similar to that of spiking in volleyball, research on tennis serve reception can also provide some reference. Tennis experts allocate their attentional resources more quickly than novices [ 42 ], focusing more on the ball, the opponent’s head and shoulders, and the racket, areas that are critical for accurately predicting the ball’s trajectory [ 21 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%