Exploring the Effects of Professional Development for the Interactive Whiteboard on Teachers’ Technology Self-Efficacy

Abstract

Executive SummaryIdentifying means of assisting teachers in integrating technology during their instruction is becoming more important as the rate new technologies enter the classroom accelerates. The primary means of helping in-service teachers employ new technologies in their classrooms is frequently professional development. Unfortunately, professional development offered to many teachers is ineffective. It has been posited that professional development can be made more effective by emphasizing one specific technology for an extended period of time, including opportunities for teachers to learn from each other in localized contexts, and organizing the learning in ways calculated to help teachers build technology self-efficacy (DeSantis, 2012). This paper shares the results of a research project conducted to determine if professional development with these attributes assists teachers with developing the skills required to integrate technology during instruction. This project involved the creation of a professional development program with the characteristics described in the literature as being most effective (Brinkerhoff, 2006;Cantrell & Hughes, 2008;DeSantis, 2012;Doppelt et al., 2009;Walker et al., 2011). This mixed-methods and design-based study identifies changes in technology self-efficacy and technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge among forty-one teachers following their participation in sustained, collaborative, and scaffolded professional development for one rapidlyembraced technology, the interactive whiteboard. The possession of technology self-efficacy assists teachers in adopting new technologies (Brinkerhoff, 2006;Holden & Rada, 2011;Tschannen-Moran & McMaster, 2009;L. Wang, Ertmer, & Newby, 2004). Technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge are indicators of teachers' abilities to utilize educational technologies during instruction (Mishra & Koehler, 2006).The results of this study indicate that teachers who participate in well-designed professional development are likely build technology self-efficacy and technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge. Qualitative analysis of semi-structured participant interviews conducted with a random sample of participants in the study revealed that the professional development program under study was integral in this development. Participants were particularly affected by the opportunities to collaborate embedded within the professional development offering under study during this project. The results from thisMaterial published as part of this publication, either on-line or in print, is copyrighted by the Informing Science Institute. Permission to make digital or paper copy of part or all of these works for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that the copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage AND that copies 1) bear this notice in full and 2) give the full citation on the first page. It is permissible to abstract these works so long as credit is given. To copy in all other cases or to r...

Exploring Teachers’ Technology Integration Self-Efficacy through the 2017 ISTE Standards

“…According to those national surveys, on average, 36% of the teachers over the three-year period reported that they are somewhat confident while 6% declared that they are not very confident in their ability to use educational technology in instructionally effective ways (HMH, , 2018). These results, aligned with prior research on teacher self-efficacy scores and technology use in classrooms (DeSantis, 2013;Ertmer & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, 2010;Evers et al, 2002;Liu et al, 2017;Tweed, 2013), further reveal there is room for meaningful improvement of integrating technology as part of teachers' classroom practice. Accordingly, elevating teachers' technology self-efficacy and preparing them to effectively integrate technology into their classrooms via multiple-track sustained PD programs to facilitate meaningful professional learning is vitally important in today's urban classroom and the world of educational practice (Beard, 2016).…”

A Longitudinal Examination of the Effects of Computer Self-efficacy Growth on Performance during Technology Training

“…While this study examines CSE as a moderator in learning technology, it is also been identified as a key outcome of learning (Kraiger, Ford, & Salas, 1993). Indeed, in recent education and organizational literature, it has been modeled as a vital consequence (outcome) in higher education settings (DeSantis, 2013;Lester, Hannah, Harms, Vogelgesang, & Avolio, 2011;Nelson, Poms, & Wolf, 2012;Smith & Woodworth, 2012).…”

A Change Laboratory professional development intervention to motivate university teachers to identify and overcome barriers to the integration of ICT

“…In TPD-ICT initiatives, design-based approaches have flourished in the past decade (Curwood, 2013;Desantis, 2013;Wang, Hsu, Reeves, Coster, & Longhurst, 2014). Linear interventions prevail in different forms.…”

“…For instance, in the Intel Teach Program (Uslu, 2012) the participants were instructed about the technology aided project-based learning. Design-based interventions (Curwood, 2013;Desantis, 2013;Wang et al, 2014) promote more participation and control over the tasks. However, the tasks are defined beforehand by the interventionist, and teachers are expected to follow the tasks of the process.…”