2015
DOI: 10.28945/2114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Longitudinal Examination of the Effects of Computer Self-efficacy Growth on Performance during Technology Training

Abstract: Technology training in the classroom is critical in preparing students for upper level classes as well as professional careers, especially in fields such as technology. One of the key enablers to this process is computer self-efficacy (CSE), which has an extensive stream of empirical research. Despite this, one of the missing pieces is how CSE actually changes during training, and how such change is related to antecedents and performance outcomes. Measuring change requires repeated data gathering and the use o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Computer Self-Efficacy (SE) is defined as a user’s belief about his/her ability to conduct a particular task using a computer. Findings also suggest that students who have higher e-learning SE are more likely to use e-learning and computer-supported education [ 39 , 43 ]. SE is considered to have high influence especially on the Perceived Ease of Use [ 40 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computer Self-Efficacy (SE) is defined as a user’s belief about his/her ability to conduct a particular task using a computer. Findings also suggest that students who have higher e-learning SE are more likely to use e-learning and computer-supported education [ 39 , 43 ]. SE is considered to have high influence especially on the Perceived Ease of Use [ 40 ].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been hypothesised that the systematic use of computers in schools could reduce gender differences in attitudes and self-efficacy (Downey and Kher 2015;Blignaut 2006;Teo and Noyes 2008). In the recent years, the use of computers in schools has increased and initiatives, such as one-to-one programmes (intensive computer use facilitated by the fact that each pupil has his/her own computer as a fundamental learning tool) or intensive use of computers in all subjects, have been adopted in a large number of countries.…”
Section: Objectives Of the Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examination of the literature revealed that, although there are studies about the self-efficacy perceptions towards computers (Aktag, 2013;Aşkar and Umay, 2001;Çetin and Güngör, 2014;Downey and Kher, 2015;Geçer, 2013;Hasan, 2003;Johnson and Wardlow, 2004;Özçelik and Kurt, 2007;Pamuk and Peker, 2009;Saleh, 2008;Sam, Othman and Nordin, 2005;Scherer and Siddiq, 2015;Shapkaa and Ferrarib, 2003;Seferoğlu and Akbıyık, 2005;Sezer, Yıldırım and Pınar, 2010;Şad and Demir, 2015;Şahin and Göçer, 2013;Turel, 2014;Topolovčan, 2014;Vekiri and Chronaki, 2008), attitudes towards computers (Sadık, 2006;Schumacher and Morahan-Martin, 2001; Shashaani, 1993) and attitudes toward CAE (Arslan, 2006a;Çelik and Bindak, 2005;Çakmak and Taşkıran, 2014;Şahin and Akçay, 2011;Teo, 2008), it can be seen that there are fewer studies about self-efficacy of teachers (Çelik and Bindak, 2005;Arslan 2008;Kutluca and Ekici, 2010), and there is a study gap regarding the collaboration of attitudes and self-efficacy perceptions of social studies teachers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%