2021
DOI: 10.3847/1538-3881/ac3746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the Effects of Active Magnetic Drag in a General Circulation Model of the Ultrahot Jupiter WASP-76b

Abstract: Ultrahot Jupiters represent an exciting avenue for testing extreme physics and observing atmospheric circulation regimes not found in our solar system. Their high temperatures result in thermally ionized particles embedded in atmospheric winds interacting with the planet’s interior magnetic field by generating current and experiencing bulk Lorentz force drag. Previous treatments of magnetic drag in 3D general circulation models (GCMs) of ultrahot Jupiters have mostly been uniform drag timescales applied evenly… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
85
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
3
85
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This would be most apparent in the upper atmosphere, where the ionisation fractions can be extremely high (Lee et al 2020). Beltz et al (2022) show that even small magnetic drag can have a large effect on the atmospheric dynamical properties of HJ atmospheres, suggesting that similar behaviour to that seen in Beltz et al ( 2022) is probably occurring in our WD-BD cases. Clouds may also provide an important effect in setting the nightside and dayside fluxes of the BDs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…This would be most apparent in the upper atmosphere, where the ionisation fractions can be extremely high (Lee et al 2020). Beltz et al (2022) show that even small magnetic drag can have a large effect on the atmospheric dynamical properties of HJ atmospheres, suggesting that similar behaviour to that seen in Beltz et al ( 2022) is probably occurring in our WD-BD cases. Clouds may also provide an important effect in setting the nightside and dayside fluxes of the BDs.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 80%
“…There are several lines of evidence indicating that the magnetic fields of hot Jupiters may be relatively strong (10-100 G), including the inflated radii of these planets (Batygin & Stevenson 2010;Yadav & Thorngren 2017) and evidence for magnetic star-planet interactions in a few systems (SPI; Cauley et al 2019). Other observations suggest that these planets may have more modest field strengths (1-10 G), including ultraviolet observations of Lyman-α and ionized carbon lines in HAT-P-11b (Ben-Jaffel et al 2022), and a small inferred hotspot offset in the phase curve of WASP-76b which might be caused by Lorentz drag (May et al 2021;Beltz et al 2022). Elsasser number scalings also predict more moderate magnetic field strengths (Stevenson 2003).…”
Section: Low Mass-loss Rates For Wasp-80b and Wasp-52bmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Figure 12 shows the 4.5 μm data compared to three-dimensional model predictions from Roman et al (2021) for both cloudy and clear cases at two different planetary gravities. While these models do use radiatively active clouds, which are important at cooler temperatures, we note that these do not consider magnetic drag (see, e.g., Rauscher & Menou 2013;Rogers & Komacek 2014;Rogers & Showman 2014;Beltz et al 2022), which is likely to be important at high temperatures, nor H 2 dissociation or nongray impacts, all of which impact the hotspot offset and circulation (for the impact of the choice of radiative scheme on predicted phase curves, see, e.g., Lee et al 2021). Nonequilibrium chemistry can also impact the emergent phase curve and is not considered in the model predictions we consider here (e.g., Steinrueck et al 2019).…”
Section: Population Trendsmentioning
confidence: 99%