2021
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18073340
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring the Associations between Early Childhood Development Outcomes and Ecological Country-Level Factors across Low- and Middle-Income Countries

Abstract: A poor start in life shapes children’s development over the life-course. Children from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) are exposed to low levels of early stimulation, greater socioeconomic deprivation and persistent environmental and health challenges. Nevertheless, little is known about country-specific factors affecting early childhood development (ECD) in LMICs. Using data from 68 LMICs collected as part of the Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys between 2010 and 2018, along with other publicly avai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 41 publications
(62 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The discrepancy in these results could be due to the small sample size, but this association is plausible given the knowledge of the effects of lead exposure on children’s development. Additionally, not being developmentally on-track according to the ECDI has been associated with environmental exposures [ 59 ] and with other factors such as low SES, lack of early stimulation, and malnutrition [ 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The discrepancy in these results could be due to the small sample size, but this association is plausible given the knowledge of the effects of lead exposure on children’s development. Additionally, not being developmentally on-track according to the ECDI has been associated with environmental exposures [ 59 ] and with other factors such as low SES, lack of early stimulation, and malnutrition [ 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%