2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10803-020-04493-5
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Exploring Social Biomarkers in High-Functioning Adults with Autism and Asperger’s Versus Healthy Controls: A Cross-Sectional Analysis

Abstract: Biomarkers for autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are lacking but would facilitate drug development for the core deficits of the disorder. We evaluated markers proposed for characterization of differences in social communication and interaction in adults with ASD versus healthy controls (HC) for utility as biomarkers. Data pooled from an observational study and baseline data from a placebo-controlled study were analyzed. Between-group differences were observed in eye-tracking tasks for activity monitoring, biomoti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 132 publications
(167 reference statements)
3
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The ASD group shows a slightly larger average pupil size throughout the task than the NT group. This could suggest that children with ASD show hyper-arousal in the tasks which they must face, which would be in accordance with previous research [ 26 , 27 , 28 , 43 ]. A rising level of activation during the task would translate into attention level difficulties that could form the basis of the characteristics that these children show when processing social information in different contexts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The ASD group shows a slightly larger average pupil size throughout the task than the NT group. This could suggest that children with ASD show hyper-arousal in the tasks which they must face, which would be in accordance with previous research [ 26 , 27 , 28 , 43 ]. A rising level of activation during the task would translate into attention level difficulties that could form the basis of the characteristics that these children show when processing social information in different contexts.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…These findings should be interpreted from a neuropsychological perspective, since alterations in visual attention are indicative of a state of anomalous neural activation. The results found indicate that indirect, objective measurements of the level of activation, such as number and time of gaze fixations (registered through eye-tracking) are potential candidate biomarkers for diagnostic indicators of the presence of ASD [ 43 ]. Even so, it would be necessary to carry out a larger future study of these measurements to refine this technique for non-invasive diagnostic screening.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Phasic LC -NE activity and related pupil dilation has been linked to sensory-perceptual processing, orienting attention and to social cognition (Bast et al, 2019). As described in the introduction individuals with ASD might have an altered neuroception of safety versus threat which results in elevated autonomic arousal and is also suggested by Del Valle Rubido et al as an explanation for the between-group differences in their study (Del Valle Rubido et al, 2020). Changes in the various pupillary parameters in the PLR are often not correlated to each other, which suggests influences of different neurological mechanisms according to Kercher et al (2020a).…”
Section: Ansmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Pupil dilation amplitude and FSIQ could significantly predict the SRS total T-score, in a model based upon these results. In the study of (Del Valle Rubido et al, 2020) better functioning, defined as less hyperactivity and higher FSIQ and PIQ scores, was related to larger pupil sizes in the ASD group. Reisinger et al (2020) included a cognitively diverse group.…”
Section: Cognitive Functioning Mental Effort and Attentionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Eye tracking enables objective, quantifiable, dense, and repeatable measurement of oculomotor indices as the overt expression of neurobiological substates driving attentional processes (Posner & Petersen, 1990). There is a growing body of work examining the potential of eye tracking as a biomarker in conditions ranging from traumatic brain injury (Bin Zahid et al, 2020; Hunfalvay et al, 2021; Samadani et al, 2016, 2017; for review see McDonald et al, 2022), to Parkinson's disease (Ba et al, 2022; Blekher et al, 2009; Brien et al, 2023; Li et al, 2023; Tsitsi et al, 2021), to autism (Bradshaw et al, 2019; Del Valle Rubido et al, 2020; Frazier et al, 2021; Loth et al, 2017; Mason et al, 2021; Murias et al, 2018; Pierce et al, 2015; Shic et al, 2022; Wen et al, 2022), though discussions regarding nomenclature are ongoing, as they are for other similar classes of biomarkers (Ba et al, 2022; Hidalgo‐Mazzei et al, 2018; Li et al, 2023; Tsitsi et al, 2021).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%